Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Privacy as Protection of the Incomputable Self: From Agnostic to Agonistic Machine Learning.Mireille Hildebrandt - 2019 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 20 (1):83-121.
    This Article takes the perspective of law and philosophy, integrating insights from computer science. First, I will argue that in the era of big data analytics we need an understanding of privacy that is capable of protecting what is uncountable, incalculable or incomputable about individual persons. To instigate this new dimension of the right to privacy, I expand previous work on the relational nature of privacy, and the productive indeterminacy of human identity it implies, into an ecological understanding of privacy, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • The Normative Grounds of Social Criticism: Kant, Rawls, and Habermas.Kenneth Baynes - 1991 - State University of New York Press.
    This book is a comparative study of Kant, Rawls, and Habermas and a critical survey of recent theories of justice. It defends the thesis that the normative ground or basis of social criticism is found in a concept of the person as a free and equal moral being.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • Habermas and the Public Sphere.Craig Calhoun (ed.) - 1993 - MIT Press.
    Harry C. Boyte. Craig Calhoun. Geoff Eley. Nancy Fraser. Nicholas Garnham. JürgenHabermas. Peter Hohendahl. Lloyd Kramer. Benjamin Lee. Thomas McCarthy. Moishe Postone. Mary P.Ryan. Michael Schudson. Michael Warner. David Zaret.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   89 citations  
  • Society-in-the-loop: programming the algorithmic social contract.Iyad Rahwan - 2018 - Ethics and Information Technology 20 (1):5-14.
    Recent rapid advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning have raised many questions about the regulatory and governance mechanisms for autonomous machines. Many commentators, scholars, and policy-makers now call for ensuring that algorithms governing our lives are transparent, fair, and accountable. Here, I propose a conceptual framework for the regulation of AI and algorithmic systems. I argue that we need tools to program, debug and maintain an algorithmic social contract, a pact between various human stakeholders, mediated by machines. To (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   61 citations