Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Thinking Through Animals: Identity, Difference, Indistinction.Matthew Calarco - 2015 - Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
    The rapidly expanding field of critical animal studies now offers a myriad of theoretical and philosophical positions from which to choose. This timely book provides an overview and analysis of the most influential of these trends. Approachable and concise, it is intended for readers sympathetic to the project of changing our ways of thinking about and interacting with animals yet relatively new to the variety of philosophical ideas and figures in the discipline. It uses three rubrics—identity, difference, and indistinction—to differentiate (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Nietzsche’s Europe: an experimental anticipation of the future.Simon Glendinning - 2016 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 47 (3):276-291.
    ABSTRACTLike Kant a little over a hundred years earlier, Nietzsche saw the history of Europe as moving towards the formation of an integrated political union. Unlike Kant, however, Nietzsche does not see this development as an unambiguous good. Kant had supposed that European integration would belong to a history of constitutional improvements that would make war between what we would now call “democratic” states in Europe increasingly less likely. Nietzsche also sees it as part of a process of democratization, but (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • A Europe of Hope.Jacques Derrida - 2006 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (2):407-412.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Flipside of Violence, or Beyond the Thought of Good Enough.Leonard Lawlor - 2014 - In Zeynep Direk & Leonard Lawlor (eds.), A Companion to Derrida. Chichester, West Sussex, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 565–580.
    Recently, questions have been raised about the imagery of violence that one finds in certain kinds of contemporary philosophical discourses that are commonly called “poststructuralist,” “postmodernist,” or “deconstructive,” that is, discourses in which Jacques Derrida was directly involved or which he inspired. The questions raised seem to consist in three types. This chapter aims to respond to each of these three questions. It takes up the second kind of question concerning the need for vigilance. The chapter begins with Plato for (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation