Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)The faculty of language: what's special about it?Ray Jackendoff & Steven Pinker - 2005 - Cognition 95 (2):201-236.
    We examine the question of which aspects of language are uniquely human and uniquely linguistic in light of recent suggestions by Hauser, Chomsky, and Fitch that the only such aspect is syntactic recursion, the rest of language being either specific to humans but not to language (e.g. words and concepts) or not specific to humans (e.g. speech perception). We find the hypothesis problematic. It ignores the many aspects of grammar that are not recursive, such as phonology, morphology, case, agreement, and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   141 citations  
  • Pirahã exceptionality: A reassessment.David Pesetsky, Andrew Nevins & Cilene Rodrigues - manuscript
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • The resilience of combinatorial structure at the word level: morphology in self-styled gesture systems.Susan Goldin-Meadow, Carolyn Mylander & Cynthia Butcher - 1995 - Cognition 56 (3):195-262.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • The expressive dimension.Christopher Potts - 2007 - Theoretical Linguistics 33 (2):165-198.
    Expressives like damn and bastard have, when uttered, an immediate and powerful impact on the context. They are performative, often destructively so. They are revealing of the perspective from which the utterance is made, and they can have a dramatic impact on how current and future utterances are perceived. This, despite the fact that speakers are invariably hard-pressed to articulate what they mean. I develop a general theory of these volatile, indispensable meanings. The theory is built around a class of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   131 citations  
  • The meaning of free choice.Anastasia Giannakidou - 2001 - Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (6):659-735.
    In this paper, I discuss the distribution and interpretation of free choice items (FCIs) in Greek, a language exhibiting a lexical paradigm of such items distinct from that of negative polarity items. Greek differs in this respect from English, which uniformly employs any. FCIs are grammatical only in certain contexts that can be characterized as nonveridical (Giannakidou 1998, 1999), and although they yield universal-like interpretations in certain structures, they are not, I argue, universal quantifiers. Evidence will be provided that FCIsare (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   34 citations  
  • Affective dependencies.Anastasia Giannakidou - 1999 - Linguistics and Philosophy 22 (4):367-421.
    Limited distribution phenomena related to negation and negative polarity are usually thought of in terms of affectivity where affective is understood as negative or downward entailing. In this paper I propose an analysis of affective contexts as nonveridical and treat negative polarity as a manifestation of the more general phenomenon of sensitivity to (non)veridicality (which is, I argue, what affective dependencies boil down to). Empirical support for this analysis will be provided by a detailed examination of affective dependencies in Greek, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   44 citations  
  • Communicative body movements: American emblems.Harold G. Johnson, Paul Ekman & Wallace V. Friesen - 1975 - Semiotica 15 (4).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (In)Definiteness, Polarity, and the Role of wh-morphology in Free Choice.Anastasia Giannakidou & Lisa Cheng - 2006 - Journal of Semantics 23 (2):135-183.
    In this paper we reconsider the issue of free choice and the role of the wh-morphology employed in it. We show that the property of being an interrogative wh-word alone is not sufficient for free choice, and that semantic and sometimes even morphological definiteness is a pre-requisite for some free choice items (FCIs) in certain languages, e.g. in Greek and Mandarin Chinese. We propose a theory that explains the polarity behaviour of FCIs cross-linguistically, and allows indefinite (Giannakidou 2001) as well (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?Hauser Marc, D. Chomsky, Noam Fitch & W. Tecumseh - 2002 - Science 298 (22):1569-1579.
    We argue that an understanding of the faculty of language requires substantial interdisciplinary cooperation. We suggest how current developments in linguistics can be profitably wedded to work in evolutionary biology, anthropology, psychology, and neuroscience. We submit that a distinction should be made between the faculty of language in the broad sense (FLB)and in the narrow sense (FLN). FLB includes a sensory-motor system, a conceptual-intentional system, and the computational mechanisms for recursion, providing the capacity to generate an infinite range of expressions (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   181 citations  
  • Contrastive-Identificational Features of Persian Gesture.Carol M. Sparhawk - 1978 - Semiotica 24 (1-2).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • On the Nature of Certain Philosophical Entities.Richard Montague - 1969 - The Monist 53 (2):159-194.
    It has been maintained that we need not tolerate such entities as pains, events, tasks, and obligations. They are indeed not required in connection with sentences like ‘Jones has a pain’, ‘the event of the sun’s rising occurred at eight’, ‘Jones performed at eight the task of lifting a stone’, or ‘Jones has the obligation to give Smith a horse’, which can be paraphrased without reference to the entities in question—for instance, in the case of the second example, as ‘the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   115 citations