Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. ΑΡΙΣΤΟΤΕΛΟΥΣ ΑΝΑΛΥΤΙΚΑ. Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics.Glenn R. Morrow & W. D. Ross - 1951 - Journal of Philosophy 48 (5):129.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Models for Modal Syllogisms.Fred Johnson - 1989 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 30 (2):271-284.
    A semantics is presented for Storrs McCall's separate axiomatizations of Aristotle's accepted and rejected polysyllogisms. The polysyllogisms under discussion are made up of either assertoric or apodeictic propositions. The semantics is given by associating a property with a pair of sets: one set consists of things having the property essentially and the other of things having it accidentally. A completeness proof and a semantic decision procedure are given.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • What is a Syllogism?T. J. Smiley - 1973 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (1):136 - 154.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   78 citations  
  • Three-Membered Domains for Aristotle's Syllogistic.Fred Johnson - 1991 - Studia Logica 50 (2):181 - 187.
    The paper shows that for any invalid polysyllogism there is a procedure for constructing a model with a domain with exactly three members and an interpretation that assigns non-empty, non-universal subsets of the domain to terms such that the model invalidates the polysyllogism.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Aristotle's Prior and Posterior Analytics.W. D. Ross - 1949 - Philosophy 25 (95):380-382.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   106 citations  
  • Aristotle's Modal Syllogisms.Ruth Barcan Marcus & Storrs McCall - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (4):539.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • The Two Barbaras.Paul Thom - 1991 - History and Philosophy of Logic 12 (2):135-149.
    This paper examines three recent discussions of Aristotle's system of syllogisms with apodeictic and assertoric premisses. Though they contain no cross-references, and though they arrive at disparate interpretations, all three pieces share a common aim. That aim is to construct an intuitively graspable interpretation of Aristotle's modal syllogistic which is based on metaphysical considerations. I argue that none of these authors has succeeded in this; nevertheless, I share their broad aim, and attempt to show that a more satisfactory interpretation can (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Modal Ecthesis.Fred Johnson - 1993 - History and Philosophy of Logic 14 (2):171-182.
    Fred's semantics for McCall's syntactic presentation of Aristotle's assertoric and apodeictic syllogistic is altered to free it from Thom's objections that it is unAristotelian. The altered semantics rejects Baroco-XLL and Bocardo-LXL, which Thom says Aristotle should have accepted. Aristotle's proofs that use ecthesis are formalized by using singular sentences. With one exception the (acceptance) axioms for McCall's system L-X-M are derivable. Formal proofs are shown to be sound.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations