Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Do Implanted Brain Devices Threaten Autonomy or the “Sense” of Autonomy?Laura Specker Sullivan - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):24-26.
    Gilbert (2015) suggests that predictive and advisory brain implants threaten autonomy. He analyzes these threats in terms of one patient's “sense of autonomy,” reporting that the patient felt more...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Are Brain-Computer Interface Devices a Form of Internal Coercion?Eran Klein - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):32-34.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Effects of Closed-Loop Medical Devices on the Autonomy and Accountability of Persons and Systems.Philipp Kellmeyer, Thomas Cochrane, Oliver Müller, Christine Mitchell, Tonio Ball, Joseph J. Fins & Nikola Biller-Andorno - 2016 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (4):623-633.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  • Broad Consent and the Implantation of Predictive Brain Technologies.Tobias Hainz - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):20-22.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Staying in the Loop: Relational Agency and Identity in Next-Generation DBS for Psychiatry.Sara Goering, Eran Klein, Darin D. Dougherty & Alik S. Widge - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 8 (2):59-70.
    In this article, we explore how deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices designed to “close the loop”—to automatically adjust stimulation levels based on computational algorithms—may risk taking the individual agent “out of the loop” of control in areas where (at least apparent) conscious control is a hallmark of our agency. This is of particular concern in the area of psychiatric disorders, where closed-loop DBS is attracting increasing attention as a therapy. Using a relational model of identity and agency, we consider whether (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   65 citations  
  • I Miss Being Me: Phenomenological Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation.Frederic Gilbert, Eliza Goddard, John Noel M. Viaña, Adrian Carter & Malcolm Horne - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 8 (2):96-109.
    The phenomenological effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) on the self of the patient remains poorly understood and under described in the literature, despite growing evidence that a significant number of patients experience postoperative neuropsychiatric changes. To address this lack of phenomenological evidence, we conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews with 17 patients with Parkinson's disease who had undergone DBS. Exploring the subjective character specific to patients' experience of being implanted gives empirical and conceptual understanding of the potential phenomenon of DBS-induced self-estrangement. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   77 citations  
  • A Threat to Autonomy? The Intrusion of Predictive Brain Implants.Frederic Gilbert - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):4-11.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   52 citations  
  • A Relational Take on Advisory Brain Implant Systems.Timothy Brown - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):46-47.
    Gilbert (2015) warns us that advisory brain implant systems—neural implants that predict brain activity and give the user advice based on those predictions—could threaten the user's autonomy. If th...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations