Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach.Peter Urbach & Colin Howson - 1993 - Chicago: Open Court. Edited by Peter Urbach.
    Scientific reasoning is—and ought to be—conducted in accordance with the axioms of probability. This Bayesian view—so called because of the central role it accords to a theorem first proved by Thomas Bayes in the late eighteenth ...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   569 citations  
  • Critical Rationalism: A Restatement and Defence.David W. Miller - 1994 - Open Court.
    David Miller elegantly and provocatively reformulates critical rationalism—the revolutionary approach to epistemology advocated by Karl Popper—by answering its most important critics. He argues for an approach to rationality freed from the debilitating authoritarian dependence on reasons and justification. "Miller presents a particularly useful and stimulating account of critical rationalism. His work is both interesting and controversial... of interest to anyone with concerns in epistemology or the philosophy of science." —Canadian Philosophical Reviews.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   118 citations  
  • The Propensity Interpretation of the Calculus of Probability, and the Quantum Theory.Karl R. Popper - 1957 - In Stefan Körner (ed.), Observation and Interpretation: A Symposium of Philosophers and Physicists. Butterworth. pp. 65--70.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   98 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Propensities and indeterminism.D. W. Miller - 1996 - In A. O' Hear (ed.), Karl Popper: Philosophy and Problems. Cambridge University Press. pp. 121--47.
    In these prefatory remarks, which are designed to locate my topic within the complex and wide-stretching field of Popper's thought and writings, I shall not say anything that those familiar with his work will not already know. Moreover, what I do say will take as understood many of the problems and theories, not to mention the terminology, that I shall later be doing my best to make understandable. My apologies are therefore due equally to those who know something about Popper's (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Can there be a realist single-case interpretation of probability?Peter Milne - 1986 - Erkenntnis 25 (2):129 - 132.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations