This volume reprints in a scholar's edition the first English-language texts on bioethics, John Gregory's (1724-1773) Observations on the Duties and Offices of a Physician and on the Method of Prosecuting Enquiries in Philosophy (London, 1770) and Lectures on the Duties and Qualifications of a Physician (London, 1772). Five previously unpublished manuscripts of Gregory's lectures are also included. An introduction places Gregory's medical ethics and philosophy of medicine in their eighteenth-century contexts of Scottish Enlightenment history and culture, Baconian science and (...) philosophy of medicine, medical practice, the feminine and feminist philosophy of the Bluestocking Circle, and moral sense philosophy, particularly David Hume's concept of sympathy, and provides a bibliography of primary and secondary sources as an aid to teaching and future scholarship. The book's index provides access to Gregory's texts, by using both historical terms and current terminology of bioethics. A volume in the subseries Classics of Medical Ethics. (shrink)

The article is devoted to the question of how the moral integrity of the physician's role can be maintained under the pressure of economic and social interests. First, the moral basis of the doctor's role is discussed and areas of conflict are systematized. Second, a preference for cases of conflict is recommended and allocational decisions are examined. The primary question of whether the doctor's role in its current moral orientation should be maintained is answered clearly in the affirmative under reference (...) to history, to the patient's self-determination and to undesirable results that are to be feared. Der Aufsatz widmet sich der Frage, wie unter dem Druck ökonomischer und gesellschaftlicher Interessen die moralische Integrität der Arztrolle gewahrt bleiben kann. Zunächst wird die moralische Grundlegung der Arztrolle dargestellt; anschließend werden Konfliktfelder systematisiert. Danach wird eine Präferenz in Konfliktfällen vorgeschlagen und ein Blick auf Allokationsentscheidungen geworfen. Die vorgängige Frage, ob die Arztrolle in ihrer jetzigen moralischen Ausrichtung bestehen bleiben soll, wird mit Verweis auf die Geschichte, auf die Selbstbestimmung der Patienten und auf zu befürchtende unerwünschte Erscheinungen eindeutig bejaht. (shrink)