Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. A Theory of Argumentation.Charles Arthur Willard - 1989 - Tuscaloosa, AL, USA: University of Alabama Press.
    Normal0falsefalsefalseMicrosoftInternetExplorer4 The thesis of this book is that argument is not a kind of logic but a kind of communication—conversation based on disagreement. Claims about the epistemic and political effects of argument get their authority not from logic but from their “fit with the facts” about how communication works. A Theory of Communication thus offers a picture of communication—distilled from elements of symbolic interactionism, personal construct theory, constructivism, and Barbara O’Keefe’s provocative thinking about logics of message design. The picture of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Probability and Induction. [REVIEW]Albert A. Bennett - 1949 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 14 (3):187-188.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • Argumentation and risk communication about genetic testing: Challenges for healthcare consumers and implications for computer systems.Nancy L. Green - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (1):113-129.
    As genetic testing for the presence of potentially health-affecting mutations becomes available for more genetic conditions, many people will soon be faced with the decision of whether or not to have a genetic test. Making an informed decision requires an understanding and evaluation of the arguments for and against having the test. As a case in point, this paper considers argumentation involving the decision of whether to have a BRCA gene test, one of the first commercially available genetic tests. First, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Natural language generation of biomedical argumentation for lay audiences.Nancy Green, Rachael Dwight, Kanyamas Navoraphan & Brian Stadler - 2011 - Argument and Computation 2 (1):23 - 50.
    This article presents an architecture for natural language generation of biomedical argumentation. The goal is to reconstruct the normative arguments that a domain expert would provide, in a manner that is transparent to a lay audience. Transparency means that an argument's structure and functional components are accessible to its audience. Transparency is necessary before an audience can fully comprehend, evaluate or challenge an argument, or re-evaluate it in light of new findings about the case or changes in scientific knowledge. The (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Probability and Induction. By William Kneale, Fellow of Exeter College and Lecturer in Philosophy in the University of Oxford. [REVIEW]Edmund Whittaker - 1949 - Philosophy 24 (91):372-374.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   58 citations  
  • A Theory of Argumentation.Charles Arthur Willard - 1991 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 24 (2):174-179.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   63 citations  
  • Processing natural language arguments with the platform.Patrick Saint-Dizier - 2012 - Argument and Computation 3 (1):49 - 82.
    In this article, we first present the platform and the Dislog language, designed for discourse analysis with a logic and linguistic perspective. The platform has now reached a certain level of maturity which allows the recognition of a large diversity of discourse structures including general-purpose rhetorical structures as well as domain-specific discourse structures. The Dislog language is based on linguistic considerations and includes knowledge access and inference capabilities. Functionalities of the language are presented together with a method for writing discourse (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • The presocratic origin of explanatory method.Jerry Stannard - 1965 - Philosophical Quarterly 15 (60):193-206.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (1 other version)Probability and induction II.William Kneale - 1949 - Mind 60 (239):310-317.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   71 citations  
  • Representation of Argumentation in Text with Rhetorical Structure Theory.Nancy L. Green - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (2):181-196.
    Various argumentation analysis tools permit the analyst to represent functional components of an argument (e.g., data, claim, warrant, backing), how arguments are composed of subarguments and defenses against potential counterarguments, and argumentation schemes. In order to facilitate a study of argument presentation in a biomedical corpus, we have developed a hybrid scheme that enables an analyst to encode argumentation analysis within the framework of Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST), which can be used to represent the discourse structure of a text. This (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • (3 other versions)Ethics demonstrated in geometrical order.Baruch Spinoza - unknown
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations