Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)Autonomy and the subjective character of experience.Kim Atkins - 2000 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (1):71–79.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • (1 other version)Autonomy and the Subjective Character of Experience.Kim Atkins - 2003 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (1):71-79.
    Books reviewed:Stephen R. L. Clark, The Political – Biology, Ethics and PoliticsTorbjörn Tannsjö, Coercive CareDavid Carr and Jan Steutel, Virture Ethics and Moral EducationLaura Westra and Patricia Werhane, The Business of Consumption: Environmental Ethics and the Global CommunityDavid Conway, Free‐Market Feminism.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Consent and end of life decisions.John Harris - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (1):10-15.
    This paper discusses the role of consent in decision making generally and its role in end of life decisions in particular. It outlines a conception of autonomy which explains and justifies the role of consent in decision making and criticises some misapplications of the idea of consent, particular the role of fictitious or “proxy” consents.Where the inevitable outcome of a decision must be that a human individual will die and where that individual is a person who can consent, then that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   46 citations  
  • Patients' responsibilities in medical ethics.Heather Draper & Tom Sorell - 2002 - Bioethics 16 (4):335–352.
    Patients have not been entirely ignored in medical ethics. There has been a shift from the general presumption that ‘doctor knows best’ to a heightened respect for patient autonomy. Medical ethics remains one–sided, however. It tends (incorrectly) to interpret patient autonomy as mere participation in decisions, rather than a willingness to take the consequences. In this respect, medical ethics remains largely paternalistic, requiring doctors to protect patients from the consequences of their decisions. This is reflected in a one–sided account of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations