Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Deducing Newton’s second law from relativity principles: A forgotten history.Olivier Darrigol - 2020 - Archive for History of Exact Sciences 74 (1):1-43.
    In French mechanical treatises of the nineteenth century, Newton’s second law of motion was frequently derived from a relativity principle. The origin of this trend is found in ingenious arguments by Huygens and Laplace, with intermediate contributions by Euler and d’Alembert. The derivations initially relied on Galilean relativity and impulsive forces. After Bélanger’s Cours de mécanique of 1847, they employed continuous forces and a stronger relativity with respect to any commonly impressed motion. The name “principle of relative motions” and the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • The Left Vienna Circle, Part 2. The Left Vienna Circle, disciplinary history, and feminist philosophy of science.Sarah S. Richardson - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (2):167-174.
    This paper analyzes the claim that the Left Vienna Circle offers a theoretical and historical precedent for a politically engaged philosophy of science today. I describe the model for a political philosophy of science advanced by LVC historians. They offer this model as a moderate, properly philosophical approach to political philosophy of science that is rooted in the analytic tradition. This disciplinary-historical framing leads to weaknesses in LVC scholars’ conception of the history of the LVC and its contemporary relevance. In (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Leibniz and the Vis Viva Controversy.Carolyn Iltis - 1971 - Isis 62 (1):21-35.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Are Conservation Laws Metaphysically Necessary?Johanna Wolff - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):898-906.
    Are laws of nature necessary, and if so, are all laws of nature necessary in the same way? This question has played an important role in recent discussion of laws of nature. I argue that not all laws of nature are necessary in the same way: conservation laws are perhaps to be regarded as metaphysically necessary. This sheds light on both the modal character of conservation laws and the relationship between different varieties of necessity.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences.Eugene Wigner - 1960 - Communications in Pure and Applied Mathematics 13:1-14.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   291 citations  
  • D'Alembert and the "Vis Viva" Controversy.Carolyn Iltis - 1970 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 1 (2):135.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • The Science of Mechanics in the Middle Ages.Marshall Clagett - 1959 - Philosophy of Science 28 (4):442-444.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   59 citations  
  • Relativistic point dynamics.Henri Arzeliès - 1971 - New York,: Pergamon Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations