Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Distributive Justice.Charles Fried - 1983 - Social Philosophy and Policy 1 (1):45.
    1. John Rawls' A Theory of Justice represented a rare intellectual event. It advanced a fresh, detailed and powerful conception of political economy, and rooted that conception in an elaborately worked out political and moral philosophy. Rawls' two principles of justice, with the celebrated maximin standard of distributive justice, represent the point of departure for any serious discussion of this subject. The details of Rawls' proposal are too well known to require summary. Instead, I shall call attention to the basic (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (1 other version)Equality of talent.John E. Roemer - 1985 - Economics and Philosophy 1 (2):151-.
    If one is an egalitarian, what should one want to equalize? Opportunities or outcomes? Resources or welfare? These positions are usually conceived to be very different. I argue in this paper that the distinction is misconceived: the only coherent conception of resource equality implies welfare equality, in an appropriately abstract description of the problem. In this section, I motivate the program which the rest of the paper carries out.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  • What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resources.Ronald Dworkin - 1981 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (4):283 - 345.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   376 citations  
  • The Calling of Sociology and Other Essays on the Pursuit of Learning.E. SHILS - 1980
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Work, Needs, and Inequality.Amartya Sen - 1997 - In On Economic Inequality. Clarendon Press.
    Some of the broader issues concerning economic inequality are addressed. Inequality is sometimes viewed in relative terms, viz., as a departure from some notion of appropriate distribution, based on needs and desert Inequality can, therefore, be viewed not merely as a measure of dispersion, but also as a measure of the difference between the actual distribution of income, and the distribution according to needs or according to some concept of desert. These two approaches are discussed.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation