Switch to: Citations

References in:

Beyond the Baldwin effect: James Mark Baldwin's 'social heredity', epigenetic inheritance, and niche construction

In Bruce H. Weber & David J. Depew (eds.), Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered. MIT Press. pp. 193--215 (2003)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior.Daniel C. Dennett - 1989 - Philosophy of Science 56 (3):540-543.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   185 citations  
  • Development and evolution: including psychophysical evolution, evolution by orthoplasy, and the theory of genetic modes.James Mark Baldwin - 1902 - Caldwell, N.J.: Blackburn Press.
    Here reprinted from the 1902 Macmillan edition.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   105 citations  
  • Darwin and the humanities.James Mark Baldwin - 1909 - New York: AMS Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Development and evolution.James-Mark Baldwin - 1902 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 54:617-620.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   73 citations  
  • (1 other version)Darwin and the Humanities.James Mark Baldwin - 1910 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 69:434-435.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Social and Ethical Interpretations in Mental Development: A Study in Social Psychology.J. M. Baldwin - 1898 - Mind 7 (28):531-535.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Thought and Things or Genetic Logic. [REVIEW]John E. Russell - 1906 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 3 (26):712-715.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Review of Michael Ruse: Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology[REVIEW]Ron Amundson - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (3):515-521.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations