Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction.Ronald W. Langacker - 2008 - Oxford University Press USA.
    This book fills a long standing need for a basic introduction to Cognitive Grammar that is current, authoritative, comprehensive, and approachable. It presents a synthesis that draws together and refines the descriptive and theoretical notions developed in this framework over the course of three decades. In a unified manner, it accommodates both the conceptual and the social-interactive basis of linguistic structure, as well as the need for both functional explanation and explicit structural description. Starting with the fundamentals, essential aspects of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Cognitive Grammar.John R. Taylor - 2002 - Oxford University Press UK.
    Cognitive Grammar offers a radical alternative to mainstream linguistic theories. This book introduces the theory in clear, non-technical language, relates it to current debates about the nature of linguistic knowledge, and applies it to in-depth analyses of a range of topics in semantics, syntax, morphology, and phonology. Study questions and suggestions for further reading accompany each of the main chapters.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • (1 other version)Hans-Jörg Schmid: Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning. how we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge. [REVIEW]Laura Vilkaitė-Lozdienė - 2018 - Cognitive Linguistics 29 (3):623-632.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Corpus evidence of the viability of statistical preemption.Adele E. Goldberg - 2011 - Cognitive Linguistics 22 (1):131-153.
    The present paper argues that there is ample corpus evidence of statistical preemption for learners to make use of. In the case of argument structure constructions, a verbi is preempted from appearing in a construction A, CxA, if and only if the following probability is high: P(CxB|context that would be suitable for CxA and verbi). For example, the probability of hearing a preemptive construction, given a context that would otherwise be well-suited for the ditransitive is high for verbs like explain (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations