Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes.Paul M. Churchland - 1981 - Journal of Philosophy 78 (2):67-90.
    Eliminative materialism is the thesis that our common-sense conception of psychological phenomena constitutes a radically false theory, a theory so fundamentally defective that both the principles and the ontology of that theory will eventually be displaced, rather than smoothly reduced, by completed neuroscience. Our mutual understanding and even our introspection may then be reconstituted within the conceptual framework of completed neuroscience, a theory we may expect to be more powerful by far than the common-sense psychology it displaces, and more substantially (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   912 citations  
  • Individualism and psychology.Tyler Burge - 1986 - Philosophical Review 95 (January):3-45.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   477 citations  
  • Folk psychology is here to stay.Terence Horgan & James Woodward - 1985 - Philosophical Review 94 (April):197-225.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   151 citations  
  • (1 other version)Autonomous psychology and the belief/desire thesis.Stephen P. Stich - 1978 - The Monist 61 (October):573-591.
    A venerable view, still very much alive, holds that human action is to be explained at least in part in terms of beliefs and desires. Those who advocate the view expect that the psychological theory which explains human behavior will invoke the concepts of belief and desire in a substantive way. I will call this expectation the belief-desire thesis. Though there would surely be a quibble or a caveat here and there, the thesis would be endorsed by an exceptionally heterogeneous (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   112 citations  
  • From folk psychology to naive psychology.Andy Clark - 1987 - Cognitive Science 11 (2):139-54.
    The notion of folk‐psychology as a primitive speculative theory of the mental is called into question. There is cause to believe that folk‐psychology has more in common with a naive physics than with early speculative physical theorising. The distinction between these is elaborated. The conclusion drawn is that commonsense ascription of psychological content, though not a suitable finishing point for cognitive science, should still provide a more reliable source of data than some contemporary theorists are willing to admit.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   70 citations  
  • Banish discontent.Jerry A. Fodor - 1986 - In Jeremy Butterfield, Language, mind and logic. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   34 citations  
  • The case against the case against belief.Richard Double - 1985 - Mind 94 (375):420-430.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations