Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Justice as impartiality.Brian Barry - 1995 - New York: Oxford University Press.
    Almost every country today contains adherents of different religions and different secular conceptions of the good life. Is there any alternative to a power struggle among them, leading most probably to either civil war or repression? The argument of this book is that justice as impartiality offers a solution. According to the theory of justice as impartiality, principles of justice are those principles that provide a reasonable basis for the unforced assent of those subject to them. The object of this (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   149 citations  
  • (1 other version)The concept of the person and the value of life.John Harris - 1999 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (4):293-308.
    : The concept of the person has come to be intimately connected with questions about the value of life. It is applied to those sorts of beings who have some special value or moral importance and where we need to prioritize the needs or claims of different sorts of individuals. "Person" is a concept designating individuals like us in some important respects, but possibly including individuals who are very unlike us in other respects. What are these respects and why are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Taking Rights Seriously.Alan R. White - 1977 - Philosophical Quarterly 27 (109):379-380.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   212 citations  
  • 20 years after-the legacy of the tuskegee syphilis study.B. J. Crigger - 1992 - Hastings Center Report 22 (6):29-29.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Should we presume moral turpitude in our children? – Small children and consent to medical research.John Harris & Søren Holm - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (2):121-129.
    When children are too young to make their ownautonomous decisions, decisions have to be madefor them. In certain contexts we allow parentsand others to make these decisions, and do notinterfere unless the decision clearly violatesthe best interest of the child. In othercontexts we put a priori limits on whatkind of decisions parents can make, and/or whatkinds of considerations they have to take intoaccount. Consent to medical research currentlyfalls into the second group mentioned here. Wewant to consider and ultimately reject one (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Justice as Impartiality. [REVIEW]Roger Paden - 1999 - International Studies in Philosophy 31 (2):115-116.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Taking rights seriously.P. Barsa - 1996 - Filosoficky Casopis 44 (2):291-305.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations