Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. On the psychology of prediction.Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky - 1973 - Psychological Review 80 (4):237-251.
    Considers that intuitive predictions follow a judgmental heuristic-representativeness. By this heuristic, people predict the outcome that appears most representative of the evidence. Consequently, intuitive predictions are insensitive to the reliability of the evidence or to the prior probability of the outcome, in violation of the logic of statistical prediction. The hypothesis that people predict by representativeness was supported in a series of studies with both naive and sophisticated university students. The ranking of outcomes by likelihood coincided with the ranking by (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   431 citations  
  • (1 other version)Additive integration of information in multiple cue judgment: A division of labor hypothesis.P. Juslin, L. Karlsson & H. Olsson - 2008 - Cognition 106 (1):259-298.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities.David M. Eddy - 1982 - In Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic & Amos Tversky (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press. pp. 249--267.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   73 citations  
  • Testing boundary conditions for the conjunction fallacy: Effects of response mode, conceptual focus, and problem type.Douglas H. Wedell & Rodrigo Moro - 2008 - Cognition 107 (1):105-136.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • (1 other version)Information integration in multiple cue judgment: A division of labor hypothesis.Peter Juslin, Linnea Karlsson & Henrik Olsson - 2008 - Cognition 106 (1):259-298.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges.Jonathan J. Koehler - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (1):1-17.
    We have been oversold on the base rate fallacy in probabilistic judgment from an empirical, normative, and methodological standpoint. At the empirical level, a thorough examination of the base rate literature (including the famous lawyer–engineer problem) does not support the conventional wisdom that people routinely ignore base rates. Quite the contrary, the literature shows that base rates are almost always used and that their degree of use depends on task structure and representation. Specifically, base rates play a relatively larger role (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   85 citations  
  • Descriptive versus normative models of sequential inference judgment.James Shanteau - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1):63.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • An additive model for sequential decision making.James C. Shanteau - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 85 (2):181.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Averaging rules and adjustment processes in Bayesian inference.Lola L. Lopes - 1985 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (6):509-512.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Context theory of classification learning.Douglas L. Medin & Marguerite M. Schaffer - 1978 - Psychological Review 85 (3):207-238.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   402 citations  
  • Converging evidence supports fuzzy-trace theory's nested sets hypothesis, but not the frequency hypothesis.Valerie F. Reyna & Britain Mills - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):278-280.
    Evidence favors the nested sets hypothesis, introduced by fuzzy-trace theory (FTT) in the 1990s to explain effects and extended to many tasks, including conjunction fallacy, syllogistic reasoning, and base-rate effects (e.g., Brainerd & Reyna 1990; Reyna 1991; 2004; Reyna & Adam 2003; Reyna & Brainerd 1995). Crucial differences in mechanisms distinguish the FTT and Barbey & Sloman (B&S) accounts, but both contrast with frequency predictions (see Reyna & Brainerd, in press).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity.Nelson Cowan - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):87-114.
    Miller (1956) summarized evidence that people can remember about seven chunks in short-term memory (STM) tasks. However, that number was meant more as a rough estimate and a rhetorical device than as a real capacity limit. Others have since suggested that there is a more precise capacity limit, but that it is only three to five chunks. The present target article brings together a wide variety of data on capacity limits suggesting that the smaller capacity limit is real. Capacity limits (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   402 citations  
  • Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes.Aron K. Barbey & Steven A. Sloman - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):241-254.
    The phenomenon of base-rate neglect has elicited much debate. One arena of debate concerns how people make judgments under conditions of uncertainty. Another more controversial arena concerns human rationality. In this target article, we attempt to unpack the perspectives in the literature on both kinds of issues and evaluate their ability to explain existing data and their conceptual coherence. From this evaluation we conclude that the best account of the data should be framed in terms of a dual-process model of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   78 citations  
  • Probability theory, not the very guide of life.Peter Juslin, Håkan Nilsson & Anders Winman - 2009 - Psychological Review 116 (4):856-874.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (4):293-315.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   615 citations  
  • Why Most People Disapprove of Me: Experience Sampling in Impression Formation.Jerker Denrell - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (4):951-978.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Exemplar effects in categorization and multiple-cue judgment.Peter Juslin, Henrik Olsson & Anna-Carin Olsson - 2003 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 (1):133.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats.Gerd Gigerenzer & Ulrich Hoffrage - 1995 - Psychological Review 102 (4):684-704.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   265 citations