Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Brain based criteria for death in the light of the Aristotelian-Scholastic anthropology.Jacek Maria Norkowski - 2018 - Scientia et Fides 6 (1):153-188.
    In 1968 the authors of the so-called Harvard Report, proposed the recognition of an irreversible coma as a new criterion for death. The proposal was accepted by the medical, legal, religious and political circles in spite of the lack of any explanation why the irreversible coma combined with the absence of brainstem reflexes, including the respiratory reflex might be equated to death. Such an explanation was formulated in the President’s Commission Report published in 1981. This document stated, that the brain (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The concept of “dialogical soul” by Joseph Ratzinger against the latest concepts of neuroscience.Monika Szetela & Grzegorz Osiński - 2017 - Scientia et Fides 5 (2):199-215.
    The concept of the dialogical soul proposed by Joseph Ratzinger is a contemporary attempt to describe the anthropology of humanity in terms of basic, fundamental theological concepts. Epistemological approach of the dialogic soul is not about the division, but co-existence in the concept of humanity significantly different anthropological concepts. Modern neuroscience, although following completely different paths of knowing is currently concerning an important issue "of the embodied mind". Such a holistic effort to discover the truth about the man, though carried (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Temporal sampling in vision and the implications for dyslexia.Kristen Pammer - 2013 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Why minds cannot be received, but are created by brains.Włodzisław Duch - 2017 - Scientia et Fides 5 (2):171-198.
    There is no controversy in psychology or brain sciences that brains create mind and consciousness. Doubts and opinions to the contrary are quite frequently expressed in non-scientific publications. In particular the idea that conscious mind is received, rather than created by the brain, is quite often used against “materialistic” understanding of consciousness. I summarize here arguments against such position, show that neuroscience gives coherent view of mind and consciousness, and that this view is intrinsically non-materialistic.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations