Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The neural basis of cognitive development: A constructivist manifesto.Steven R. Quartz & Terrence J. Sejnowski - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):537-556.
    How do minds emerge from developing brains? According to the representational features of cortex are built from the dynamic interaction between neural growth mechanisms and environmentally derived neural activity. Contrary to popular selectionist models that emphasize regressive mechanisms, the neurobiological evidence suggests that this growth is a progressive increase in the representational properties of cortex. The interaction between the environment and neural growth results in a flexible type of learning: minimizes the need for prespecification in accordance with recent neurobiological evidence (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   104 citations  
  • The child's trigger experience: Degree-0 learnability.David Lightfoot - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (2):321-334.
    According to a “selective” (as opposed to “instructive”) model of human language capacity, people come to know more than they experience. The discrepancy between experience and eventual capacity (the “poverty of the stimulus”) is bridged by genetically provided information. Hence any hypothesis about the linguistic genotype (or “Universal Grammar,” UG) has consequences for what experience is needed and what form people's mature capacities (or “grammars”) will take. This BBS target article discusses the “trigger experience,” that is, the experience that actually (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   93 citations  
  • In defense of learning by selection: Neurobiological and behavioral evidence revisited.G. Dehaene-Lambertz & Stanislas Dehaene - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):560-561.
    Quartz & Sejnowski's constructivist manifesto promotes a return to an extreme form of empiricism. In defense of learning by selection, we argue that at the neurobiological level all the data presented by Q&S in support of their constructive model are in fact compatible with a model comprising multiple overlapping stages of synaptic overproduction and selection. We briefly review developmental studies at the behavioral level in humans providing evidence in favor of a selectionist view of development.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Neuronal models of cognitive functions.Jean-Pierre Changeux & Stanislas Dehaene - 1989 - Cognition 33 (1-2):63-109.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   49 citations  
  • Constructivism, nativism, and explanatory adequacy.Derek Bickerton - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):557-558.
    Constructivism is the most recent in a long line of failed attempts to discredit nativism. It seeks support from true (but irrelevant) facts, wastes its energy on straw men, and jumps logical gaps; but its greatest weakness lies in its failure to match nativism's explanation of a wide range of disparate phenomena, particularly in language acquisition.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Canonical linking rules: forward versus reverse linking in normally developing and specifically language-impaired children.Heather K. J. van der Lely - 1994 - Cognition 51 (1):29-72.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Separate visual pathways for perception and action.Melvyn A. Goodale & A. David Milner - 1992 - Trends in Neurosciences 15:20-25.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   344 citations