Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Who Is Descartes’ Evil Genius?Samuel A. Stoner - 2018 - Journal of Early Modern Studies 7 (2):9-29.
    This essay examines René Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy. It argues that the evil genius is the meditator who narrates Meditations and that Descartes’ goal in Meditation One is to transform his readers into evil geniuses. This account of the evil genius is significant because it explains why the evil genius must be finite and why it cannot call mathematics or logic into doubt. Further, it highlights the need to read the Meditations on two levels—one examining the meditator’s line of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Faculties, Knowledge, and Reasons for Doubt in the Cartesian Circle.Matthew Clark - 2019 - Mind 128 (511):647-672.
    This paper argues for a novel solution to the Cartesian Circle by emphasising the important epistemic role of the Second Meditation and Descartes’ faculty epistemology. I argue that, for Descartes: doubt requires a ‘good reason’ to doubt ; whether a reason qualifies as a ‘good reason’ depends on which faculty produces that reason ; and for distinct metaphysical perceptions from the faculty of the intellect, no other faculty can provide ‘good reasons’ to doubt. The upshot of §2 is that the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Spinoza, Descartes, and the "stupid Cartesians".Steven Nadler - 2019 - In Steven Nadler, Tad M. Schmaltz & Delphine Antoine-Mahut (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations