Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Doing Gender.Don H. Zimmerman & Candace West - 1987 - Gender and Society 1 (2):125-151.
    The purpose of this article is to advance a new understanding of gender as a routine accomplishment embedded in everyday interaction. To do so entails a critical assessment of existing perspectives on sex and gender and the introduction of important distinctions among sex, sex category, and gender. We argue that recognition of the analytical independence of these concepts is essential for understanding the interactional work involved in being a gendered person in society. The thrust of our remarks is toward theoretical (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   398 citations  
  • Family employment status and gender role attitudes: A comparison of women and men college graduates.Bruce O. Warren & Margaret L. Cassidy - 1996 - Gender and Society 10 (3):312-329.
    Data from 590 college graduates are used to assess the relationship between family employment status and gender role attitudes for a predominately European American sample. The women in this study are employed full time, part time, or are full-time homemakers, and all report being married to men employed full time. The men in the study are all employed full time and report having wives who are employed full time, part time, or are full-time homemakers. Controlling for the effects of selected (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Changes in U.s. Men's attitudes toward the family provider role, 1972-1989.Jane Riblett Wilkie - 1993 - Gender and Society 7 (2):261-279.
    This article examines changes in men's attitudes toward the family provider role using data from the National Opinion Research Center, General Social Surveys for 1972 through 1989. Men's attitudes have become more egalitarian over this period; however, men approve more of sharing provider-role enactment than of sharing provider-role responsibility. Cohort succession was a more important source of change than change within cohorts. Differences among men in attitudes toward the provider role were associated with differences in men's provider-role experiences, although there (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations