Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Domain-general and Domain-specific Patterns of Activity Support Metacognition in Human Prefrontal Cortex.Jorge Morales, Hakwan Lau & Stephen M. Fleming - 2018 - The Journal of Neuroscience 38 (14):3534-3546.
    Metacognition is the capacity to evaluate the success of one's own cognitive processes in various domains; for example, memory and perception. It remains controversial whether metacognition relies on a domain-general resource that is applied to different tasks or if self-evaluative processes are domain specific. Here, we investigated this issue directly by examining the neural substrates engaged when metacognitive judgments were made by human participants of both sexes during perceptual and memory tasks matched for stimulus and performance characteristics. By comparing patterns (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • A healthy heart is not a metronome: an integrative review of the heart's anatomy and heart rate variability.Fred Shaffer, Rollin McCraty & Christopher L. Zerr - 2014 - Frontiers in Psychology 5:108292.
    Heart rate variability (HRV), the change in the time intervals between adjacent heartbeats, is an emergent property of interdependent regulatory systems that operate on different time scales to adapt to challenges and achieve optimal performance. This article briefly reviews neural regulation of the heart, and its basic anatomy, the cardiac cycle, and the sinoatrial and atrioventricular pacemakers. The cardiovascular regulation center in the medulla integrates sensory information and input from higher brain centers, and afferent cardiovascular system inputs to adjust heart (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • What is an Emotion?William James - 1884 - Mind 9:188.
    A perfectly matched layer (PML) absorbing material composed of a uniaxial anisotropic material is presented for the truncation of finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) lattices. It is shown that the uniaxial PML material formulation is mathematically equivalent to the perfectly matched layer method published by Berenger (see J. Computat. Phys., Oct. 1994). However, unlike Berenger's technique, the uniaxial PML absorbing medium presented in this paper is based on a Maxwellian formulation. Numerical examples demonstrate that the FDTD implementation of the uniaxial PML medium (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   750 citations  
  • How to measure metacognition.Stephen Fleming & Hakwan Lau - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8 (443):1–9.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   87 citations  
  • “Passion” versus “patience”: the effects of valence and arousal on constructive word recognition.Anne Kever, Delphine Grynberg, Arnaud Szmalec, Eleonore Smalle & Nicolas Vermeulen - 2019 - Cognition and Emotion 33 (6):1302-1309.
    ABSTRACTAccumulating evidence suggests that emotional information is often recognised faster than neutral information. Several studies examined the effects of valence and arousal on word recognition, but yielded partially diverging results. Here, we used two alternative versions of a constructive recognition paradigm in which a target word is hidden by a visual mask that gradually disappears, to investigate whether the emotional properties of words influence their speed of recognition. Participants were instructed either to classify the incrementally appearing word as emotional or (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Congruent bodily arousal promotes the constructive recognition of emotional words.Anne Kever, Delphine Grynberg & Nicolas Vermeulen - 2017 - Consciousness and Cognition 53:81-88.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Disentangling the Effects of Arousal and Valence on Memory for Intrinsic Details.Mara Mather & Matthew Sutherland - 2009 - Emotion Review 1 (2):118-119.
    Kensinger (2009) and Mather (2007) both argue that intrinsic features of emotional items are remembered better than intrinsic features of non-emotional items. However, Kensinger attributes these effects to negative valence whereas Mather attributes them to arousal. In this paper, we note several reasons why arousal may be the driving factor even when a study reveals more detailed memory for negative items than for positive items. We also reanalyze previous data (Mather & Nesmith, 2008) to show that although both arousal and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Emotion and memory: A recognition advantage for positive and negative words independent of arousal.James S. Adelman & Zachary Estes - 2013 - Cognition 129 (3):530-535.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Remembering the Details: Effects of Emotion.Elizabeth A. Kensinger - 2009 - Emotion Review 1 (2):99-113.
    Though emotion conveys memory benefits, it does not enhance memory equally for all aspects of an experience, nor for all types of emotional events. In this review, I outline the behavioral evidence for arousal's focal enhancements of memory and describe the neural processes that may support those focal enhancements. I also present behavioral evidence to suggest that these focal enhancements occur more often for negative experiences than for positive ones. This result appears to arise because of valence-dependent effects on the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   69 citations  
  • Cross-Domain Association in Metacognitive Efficiency Depends on First-Order Task Types.Alan L. F. Lee, Eugene Ruby, Nathan Giles & Hakwan Lau - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • A signal detection theoretic approach for estimating metacognitive sensitivity from confidence ratings.Brian Maniscalco & Hakwan Lau - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (1):422-430.
    How should we measure metacognitive sensitivity, i.e. the efficacy with which observers’ confidence ratings discriminate between their own correct and incorrect stimulus classifications? We argue that currently available methods are inadequate because they are influenced by factors such as response bias and type 1 sensitivity . Extending the signal detection theory approach of Galvin, Podd, Drga, and Whitmore , we propose a method of measuring type 2 sensitivity that is free from these confounds. We call our measure meta-d′, which reflects (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   78 citations