Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Object reference in a shared domain of conversation.Robbert-Jan Beun & Anita H. M. Cremers - 1998 - Pragmatics and Cognition 6 (1):121-152.
    In this paper we report on an investigation into the principles underlying the choice of a particular referential expression to refer to an object located in a domain to which both participants in the dialogue have visual as well as physical access. Our approach is based on the assumption that participants try to use as little effort as possible when referring to objects. This assumption is operational-ized in two factors, namely the focus of attention and a particular choice of features (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Referring as a collaborative process.Herbert H. Clark & Deanna Wilkes-Gibbs - 1986 - Cognition 22 (1):1-39.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   194 citations  
  • Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: evidence from eye movements.Joy E. Hanna & Michael K. Tanenhaus - 2004 - Cognitive Science 28 (1):105-115.
    In order to investigate whether addressees can make immediate use of speaker‐based constraints during reference resolution, participant addressees' eye movements were monitored as they helped a confederate cook follow a recipe. Objects were located in the helper's area, which the cook could not reach, and the cook's area, which both could reach. Critical referring expressions matched one object (helper's area) or two objects (helper's and cook's areas), and were produced when the cook's hands were empty or full, which defined the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  • What speakers do and what addressees look at.Marianne Gullberg & Kenneth Holmqvist - 2006 - Pragmatics and Cognition 14 (1):53-82.
    This study investigates whether addressees visually attend to speakers’ gestures in interaction and whether attention is modulated by changes in social setting and display size. We compare a live face-to-face setting to two video conditions. In all conditions, the face dominates as a fixation target and only a minority of gestures draw fixations. The social and size parameters affect gaze mainly when combined and in the opposite direction from the predicted with fewer gestures fixated on video than live. Gestural holds (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • (1 other version)Embodied communication: Speakers’ gestures affect listeners’ actions.Susan Wagner Cook & Michael K. Tanenhaus - 2009 - Cognition 113 (1):98-104.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • (1 other version)Embodied communication: Speakers’ gestures affect listeners’ actions.Michael K. Tanenhaus Susan Wagner Cook - 2009 - Cognition 113 (1):98.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Language and thought: Aspects of a cognitive theory of semantics.David R. Olson - 1970 - Psychological Review 77 (4):257-273.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   66 citations