Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. An Approach to Evaluating Therapeutic Misconception.Scott Y. H. Kim, Lauren Schrock, Renee M. Wilson, Samuel A. Frank, Robert G. Holloway, Karl Kieburtz & Raymond G. De Vries - 2009 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 31 (5):7.
    Subjects enrolled in studies testing high risk interventions for incurable or progressive brain diseases may be vulnerable to deficiencies in informed consent, such as the therapeutic misconception. However, the definition and measurement of the therapeutic misconception is a subject of continuing debate. Our qualitative pilot study of persons enrolled in a phase I trial of gene transfer for Parkinson disease suggests potential avenues for both measuring and preventing the therapeutic misconception. Building on earlier literature on the topic, we developed and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • Are patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis at risk of a therapeutic misconception?Scott Y. H. Kim, Renee Wilson, Raymond De Vries, Kerry A. Ryan, Robert G. Holloway & Karl Kieburtz - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (8):514-518.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Understanding the ‘therapeutic misconception’ from the research participant’s perspective.Scott Y. H. Kim, Raymond De Vries, Robert G. Holloway & Karl Kieburtz - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (8):522-523.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • False Hopes and Best Data: Consent to Research and the Therapeutic Misconception.Paul S. Appelbaum, Loren H. Roth, Charles W. Lidz, Paul Benson & William Winslade - 1987 - Hastings Center Report 17 (2):20-24.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   161 citations  
  • How not to test the prevalence of therapeutic misconception.Paul S. Appelbaum - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (8):519-520.
    Almost 35 years ago, my colleagues and I first reported a new phenomenon: the decisions of many freshly enrolled research subjects appeared to be based on confusion between the nature of research and of ordinary treatment.1 We called the phenomenon ‘therapeutic misconception’ (TM), and noted that it was characterised by inaccurate beliefs about the degree of individualisation of treatment and likelihood of benefit associated with enrolment in a clinical trial. Since that original paper, dozens of studies from around the world (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations