- The self-vindication of the laboratory sciences.Ian Hacking - 1992 - In Andrew Pickering (ed.), Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 29--64.details
|
|
Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach.Peter Urbach & Colin Howson - 1993 - Chicago: Open Court. Edited by Peter Urbach.details
|
|
Frequentist probability and frequentist statistics.J. Neyman - 1977 - Synthese 36 (1):97 - 131.details
|
|
Review. [REVIEW]Barry Gower - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):555-559.details
|
|
Duhem's problem, the bayesian way, and error statistics, or "what's belief got to do with it?".Deborah G. Mayo - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (2):222-244.details
|
|
Error probabilities in error.Colin Howson - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):194.details
|
|
Models of data.Patrick Suppes - 2009 - In Ernest Nagel, Patrick Suppes & Alfred Tarski (eds.), Provability, Computability and Reflection. Stanford, CA, USA: Elsevier.details
|
|
(1 other version)The Appraisal of Theories: Kuhn Meets Bayes.Wesley C. Salmon - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:325 - 332.details
|
|
Increasing Public Participation in Controversies Involving Hazards: The Value of Metastatistical Rules.Deborah G. Mayo - 1985 - Science, Technology and Human Values 10 (4):55-65.details
|
|
"Duhem's Problem, the Bayesian Way, and Error Statistics, or" What's Belief Got to Do with It?Deborah G. Mayott - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (2):222-244.details
|
|