Switch to: Citations

References in:

Priority and Time

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):287 - 309 (1997)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1984 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1651 citations  
  • Mortal Questions.[author unknown] - 1979 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 43 (3):578-578.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   524 citations  
  • Equality or Priority?Derek Parfit - 2001 - In John Harris (ed.), Bioethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 81-125.
    One of the central debates within contemporary Anglo-American political philosophy concerns how to formulate an egalitarian theory of distributive justice which gives coherent expression to egalitarian convictions and withstands the most powerful anti-egalitarian objections. This book brings together many of the key contributions to that debate by some of the world’s leading political philosophers: Richard Arneson, G.A. Cohen, Ronald Dworkin, Thomas Nagel, Derek Parfit, John Rawls, T.M. Scanlon, and Larry Temkin.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   238 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Fragmentation of Value.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - In Mortal questions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   124 citations  
  • Comments.Derek Parfit - 1986 - Ethics 96 (4):832-872.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   65 citations  
  • The Separateness of Persons, Distributive Norms, and Moral Theory.David Brink - 1993 - In Raymond Gillespie Frey & Christopher W. Morris (eds.), Value, Welfare, and Morality. Cambridge University Press. pp. 252-289.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Egalitarianism.Dennis McKerlie - 1984 - Dialogue 23 (2):223-237.
    Several writers have tried to describe the foundations of an egalitarian moral view. Their aim is to explain the way of thinking on which distinctively egalitarian conclusions depend. Egalitarianism is frequently located by reference to utilitarianism. The basic features of the utilitarian view are reasonably well understood and most of us find it at least plausible. Egalitarians want to show that their own view differs from the utilitarian view in some fundamental respect. They hope to convince us that the egalitarian (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Equality between age-groups.Dennis McKerlie - 1992 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 21 (3):275-295.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • [Book review] morality, mortality. [REVIEW]Frances Myrna Kamm - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (1).
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   68 citations