- ``Who, Me?".Steven E. Boër & William G. Lycan - 1980 - Philosophical Review 89 (3):427-466.details
|
|
Reflexivity.Nathan Salmon - 1986 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27 (3):401-429.details
|
|
Thought and reference.Kent Bach - 1987 - New York: Clarendon Press.details
|
|
Collected papers.Gareth Evans - 1985 - New York: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Reflections on Reflexivity.Nathan Salmon - 1992 - Linguistics and Philosophy 15 (1):53 - 63.details
|
|
Who, Me?Steven E. Boër & William G. Lycan - 1980 - Philosophical Review 89 (3):427 - 466.details
|
|
De Re and De Se Belief.Thomas J. McKay - 1988 - In D. F. Austin (ed.), Philosophical Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 207--217.details
|
|
Propositional Attitudes: An Essay on Thoughts and How We Ascribe Them.Mark Richard - 1990 - Cambridge [England] ; New York: Cambridge University Press.details
|
|
(1 other version)Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes, and Semantic Content.Scott Soames - 1987 - Philosophical Topics 15 (1):47-87.details
|
|
Direct reference and ascriptions of belief.Mark Richard - 1983 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 12 (4):425--52.details
|
|
Anaphora and Semantic Structure.Emmon Bach & Barbara H. Partee - 2004 - In Barbara Hall Partee (ed.), Compositionality in formal semantics: selected papers of Barbara H. Partee. Malden, MA: Blackwell. pp. 122--152.details
|
|
Propositions and Attitudes.Nathan U. Salmon & Scott Soames (eds.) - 1988 - New York: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Substitutivity.Scott Soames - 1987 - In Judith Jarvis Thomson (ed.), On Being and Saying: Essays for Richard Cartwright. MIT Press. pp. 99-132.details
|
|
Attitudes and anaphora.Scott Soames - 1994 - Philosophical Perspectives 8:251-272.details
|
|
(1 other version)Direct reference, propositional attitudes, and semantic content.Scott Soames - 2009 - In Philosophical Essays, Volume 2: The Philosophical Significance of Language. Princeton University Press. pp. 33-71.details
|
|
XI*—Pronouns and Propositional Attitudes.Scott Soames - 1990 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 90 (1):191-212.details
|
|