Switch to: Citations

References in:

Are decisions motive-perpetuating?

Analysis 59 (4):266-275 (1999)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Intention, plans, and practical reason.Michael Bratman - 1987 - Cambridge: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    What happens to our conception of mind and rational agency when we take seriously future-directed intentions and plans and their roles as inputs into further practical reasoning? The author's initial efforts in responding to this question resulted in a series of papers that he wrote during the early 1980s. In this book, Bratman develops further some of the main themes of these essays and also explores a variety of related ideas and issues. He develops a planning theory of intention. Intentions (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   807 citations  
  • Oughts, options, and actualism.Frank Jackson & Robert Pargetter - 1986 - Philosophical Review 95 (2):233-255.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   180 citations  
  • The Toxin Puzzle.Gregory S. Kavka - 1983 - Analysis 43 (1):33-36.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   312 citations  
  • The Psychology of Freedom.Thomas Pink - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
    This 1996 book presents an alternative theory of the will - of our capacity for decision making. The book argues that taking a decision to act is something we do, and do freely - as much an action as the actions which our decisions explain - and that our freedom of action depends on this capacity for free decision-making. But decision-making is no ordinary action. Decisions to act also have a special executive function, that of ensuring the rationality of the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • The Psychology of Freedom.Thomas Pink - 1996 - Philosophy 73 (284):305-307.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • Rational cooperation, intention, and reconsideration.Joe Mintoff - 1997 - Ethics 107 (4):612-643.
    In their attempt to provide a reason to be moral, contractarians such as David Gauthier are concerned with situations allowing a group of agents the chance of mutual benefit, so long as at least some of them are prepared to constrain their maximising behaviour. But what justifies this constraint? Gauthier argues that it could be rational (because maximising) to intend to constrain one's behaviour, and in certain circumstances to act on this intention. The purpose of this paper is to examine (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations