Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (2 other versions)Decision theory as philosophy.Mark Kaplan - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (4):549-577.
    Is Bayesian decision theory a panacea for many of the problems in epistemology and the philosophy of science, or is it philosophical snake-oil? For years a debate had been waged amongst specialists regarding the import and legitimacy of this body of theory. Mark Kaplan had written the first accessible and non-technical book to address this controversy. Introducing a new variant on Bayesian decision theory the author offers a compelling case that, while no panacea, decision theory does in fact have the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   166 citations  
  • Second-order probabilities and belief functions.Jonathan Baron - 1987 - Theory and Decision 23 (1):25-36.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Cost-Value Analysis in Health Care: Making Sense out of QALYs.Erik Nord - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (202):132-133.
    This book is a comprehensive account of what it means to try to quantify health in distributing resources for health care. It examines the concept of QALYs which supposedly makes it more accurate to talk about life in terms of both quality and quantity of years lived when referring to health care policy. It offers an elegant new approach to comparing the costs and benefits of medical interventions. Cost-Utility Analysis is a method designed by economists to aid decision makers distribute (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Decision Making Under Great Uncertainty.Sven Ove Hansson - 1996 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 26 (3):369-386.
    This article is an attempt at a systematic account of decision making under greater uncertainty than what traditional, mathematically oriented decision theory can cope with. Four components of great uncertainty are distinguished: (1) the identity of the options is not well determined (uncertainty of demarcation) ; (2) the consequences of at least some option are unknown (uncertainty of consequences); (3) it is not clear whether information obtained from others, such as experts, can be relied on (uncertainty of reliance); and (4) (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • Defining "good" and "bad" in terms of "better".Sven Ove Hansson - 1989 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 31 (1):136-149.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • The Appropriateness of the Expected Utility Model.Bengt Hansson - 1975 - Erkenntnis 9 (2):175 - 193.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations