Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Nicomachean ethics.H. Aristotle & Rackham - 2002 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by C. J. Rowe & Sarah Broadie.
    Terence Irwin's edition of the Nicomachean Ethics offers more aids to the reader than are found in any modern English translation. It includes an Introduction, headings to help the reader follow the argument, explanatory notes on difficult or important passages, and a full glossary explaining Aristotle's technical terms. The Third Edition offers additional revisions of the translation as well as revised and expanded versions of the notes, glossary, and Introduction. Also new is an appendix featuring translated selections from related texts (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   965 citations  
  • Cognitivism in the theory of emotions.John Deigh - 1994 - Ethics 104 (4):824-54.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   157 citations  
  • Against characterizing mental states as propositional attitudes.Hanoch Ben-Yami - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (186):84-89.
    The reason for characterizing mental states as propositional attitudes is sentence form: ‘S Vs that p’. However, many mental states are not ascribed by means of such sentences, and the sentences that ascribe them cannot be appropriately paraphrased. Moreover, even if a paraphrase were always available, that in itself would not establish the characterization. And the mental states that are ascribable by appropriate senses do not form any natural subset of mental states. A reason for the characterization relying on beliefs, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Phaedrus. Plato & Harvey Yunis (eds.) - 1956 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Ostensibly a discussion about love, the debate in the Phaedrus also encompasses the art of rhetoric and how it should be practised. This new edition contains an introductory essay outlining the argument of the dialogue as a whole and Plato's arguments about rhetoric and eros in particular. The Introduction also considers Plato's style and offers an account of the reception of the dialogue from its composition to the twentieth century. A new Greek text of the dialogue is accompanied by a (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   102 citations  
  • Phaedrus. Plato - 1956 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 1 (3):182-183.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   188 citations  
  • Treatise of Human Nature.L. A. Selby-Bigge (ed.) - 1739 - Oxford University Press.
    David Hume's Treatise of Human Nature, composed before the author was twenty-eight years old, was published in 1739 and 1740. In revising the late L.A. Selby-Bigge's edition of Hume's Treatise Professor Nidditch corrected verbal errors and took account of Hume's manuscript amendments. He also supplied the text of theof the Treatise following the original 1740 edition and provided an apparatus of variant readings.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   171 citations  
  • Desires are not propositional attitudes.Paul Thagard - 2006 - Dialogue 45 (1):151-156.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Desires Are Not Propositional Attitudes.Paul Thagard - 2006 - Dialogue 45 (1):151-156.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • A Treatise of Human Nature.David Hume & A. D. Lindsay - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (33):379-380.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1726 citations  
  • Nicomachean Ethics.Terence Irwin & Aristotle of Stagira - 1999 - Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
    Building on the strengths of the first edition, the second edition of the Irwin Nicomachean Ethics features a revised translation (with little editorial intervention), expanded notes (including a summary of the argument of each chapter), an expanded Introduction, and a revised glossary.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   214 citations  
  • [Book Chapter].P. Thagard & C. P. Shelley - 1997
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   198 citations  
  • Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain.Antonio R. Damasio - 1994 - Putnam.
    Linking the process of rational decision making to emotions, an award-winning scientist who has done extensive research with brain-damaged patients notes the dependence of thought processes on feelings and the body's survival-oriented regulators. 50,000 first printing.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1384 citations  
  • How to Give a Piece of Your Mind: Or, the Logic of Belief and Assent.Ronald B. De Sousa - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (1):52 - 79.
    Nothing seems to follow strictly from 'X believes that p'. But if we reinterpret it to mean: 'X can consistently be described as consistently believing p'--which roughly renders, I think, Hintikka's notion of "defensibility"--we can get on with the subject, freed from the inhibitions of descriptive adequacy. But defensibility is neither necessary nor sufficient for truth: it tells us little, therefore, about the concept of belief on which it is based. It cannot, in particular, specify necessary conditions for the consistent (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • On the aim of belief.J. David Velleman - manuscript
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   81 citations  
  • Pensées.Blaise Pascal - 1670 - In Aloysius Martinich, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger. London: Blackwell. pp. 111-112.
    "I know of no religious writer more pertinent to our time."—T. S. Eliot, Introduction to Pensees Intended to prove that religion is not contrary to reason, Pascal's Pensees rank among the liveliest and most eloquent defenses of Christianity. Motivated by the seventeenth-century view of the supremacy of human reason, Pascal (1623–1662) had intended to write an ambitious apologia for Christianity in which he argued the inability of reason to address metaphysical problems. His untimely death prevented the work's completion, but the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   132 citations