Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Us and Them : Scientists' and Animal Rights Campaigners' Views of the Animal Experimentation Debate.Elizabeth S. Paul - 1995 - Society and Animals 3 (1):1-21.
    Animal rights campaigners and scientists working with animals completed anonymous questionnaires in which they were asked to report, not only on their own beliefs and ideas about the animal experimentation debate, but also on those they perceived the opposing group to hold. Both groups of participants tended to have a negative and somewhat extreme view of the other. But they did have an accurate grasp of the arguments and defenses commonly offered on both sides of the debate, and showed some (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Against Liberation: Putting Animals in Perspective.Michael P. T. Leahy - 1992 - Environmental Values 1 (1):81-83.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Animal rights and wrongs.Roger Scruton - 2000 - London: Metro in association with Demos.
    This paperback edition is fully updated with new chapters on the livestoick crisis, fishing and BSE and a layman's guide introduction to philosophical concepts, ...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  • Against Liberation: Putting Animals in Perspective.Michael P. T. Leahy - 1991 - New York: Routledge.
    The Western world is currently gripped by an obsessive concern for the rights of animals - their uses and abuses. In this book, Leahy argues that this is a movement based upon a series of fundamental misconceptions about the basic nature of animals. This is a radical philosophical questioning of prevailing views on animal rights, which credit animals with a self-consciousness like ours. Leahy's conclusions have implications for issues such as bloodsports, meat eating and fur trading.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • Deviance & Respectability the Social Construction of Moral Meanings.Jack D. Douglas - 1970
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (1 other version)Review of : Against Liberation: Putting Animals in Perspective[REVIEW]R. G. Frey - 1993 - Ethics 103 (4):834-835.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • From Vilification to Accommodation: Making a Common Cause Movement.Lyle Munro - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (1):46-57.
    The history of the vivisection debate is a case study in the use of vilification not unlike its rhetorical use by adversaries in the pro-life/pro-choice controversy. According to Vanderford, vilification in that debate serves a number of functions: to identify adversaries as ; to cast opponents in an exclusively negative light; to attribute diabolical motives to one's adversaries; and to magnify the opposition's power as an enemy capable of doing great evil. In the vivisection debate, both sides have attempted to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations