Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. A natural language bipolar argumentation approach to support users in online debate interactions†.Elena Cabrio & Serena Villata - 2013 - Argument and Computation 4 (3):209-230.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: Postulates and properties.Nikos Gorogiannis & Anthony Hunter - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence 175 (9-10):1479-1497.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  • The ASPIC+ framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial.Sanjay Modgil & Henry Prakken - 2014 - Argument and Computation 5 (1):31-62.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   67 citations  
  • Answer-set programming encodings for argumentation frameworks.Uwe Egly, Sarah Alice Gaggl & Stefan Woltran - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (2):147-177.
    Answer-set programming (ASP) has emerged as a declarative programming paradigm where problems are encoded as logic programs, such that the so-called answer sets of theses programs represent the solutions of the encoded problem. The efficiency of the latest ASP solvers reached a state that makes them applicable for problems of practical importance. Consequently, problems from many different areas, including diagnosis, data integration, and graph theory, have been successfully tackled via ASP. In this work, we present such ASP-encodings for problems associated (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • Defeasible Reasoning.John L. Pollock - 1987 - Cognitive Science 11 (4):481-518.
    There was a long tradition in philosophy according to which good reasoning had to be deductively valid. However, that tradition began to be questioned in the 1960’s, and is now thoroughly discredited. What caused its downfall was the recognition that many familiar kinds of reasoning are not deductively valid, but clearly confer justification on their conclusions. Here are some simple examples.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   342 citations  
  • Using arguments for making and explaining decisions.Leila Amgoud & Henri Prade - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence 173 (3-4):413-436.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   34 citations  
  • On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games.Phan Minh Dung - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence 77 (2):321-357.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   471 citations  
  • Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities.Henry Prakken & Giovanni Sartor - 1997 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7 (1-2):25-75.
    ABSTRACT Inspired by legal reasoning, this paper presents a semantics and proof theory of a system for defeasible argumentation. Arguments are expressed in a logic-programming language with both weak and strong negation, conflicts between arguments are decided with the help of priorities on the rules. An important feature of the system is that these priorities are not fixed, but are themselves defeasibly derived as conclusions within the system. Thus debates on the choice between conflicting arguments can also be modelled. The (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   89 citations  
  • A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation.Guillermo R. Simari & Ronald P. Loui - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence 53 (2-3):125-157.
    We present a mathematical approach to defeasible reasoning based on arguments. This approach integrates the notion of specificity introduced by Poole and the theory of warrant presented by Pollock. The main contribution of this paper is a precise, well-defined system which exhibits correct behavior when applied to the benchmark examples in the literature. It aims for usability rather than novelty. We prove that an order relation can be introduced among equivalence classes of arguments under the equi-specificity relation. We also prove (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   80 citations  
  • Representing the semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks based on arguments and attacks.Phan Minh Dung & Phan Minh Thang - 2018 - Argument and Computation 9 (3):249-267.
    dialectical frameworks have been proposed as a generalization of the abstract argumentation frameworks. The semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks is defined by identifying different...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • GORGIAS: Applying argumentation.Antonis C. Kakas, Pavlos Moraitis & Nikolaos I. Spanoudakis - 2018 - Argument and Computation 10 (1):55-81.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support.Andrea Cohen, Sebastian Gottifredi, Alejandro J. García & Guillermo R. Simari - 2015 - Journal of Applied Logic 13 (4):509-533.
    This work introduces the Attack-Support Argumentation Framework (ASAF), an approach to abstract argumentation that allows for the representation and combination of attack and support relations. This framework extends the argumentation Framework with Recursive Attacks (AFRA) in two ways. Firstly, it adds a support relation enabling to express support for arguments; this support can also be given to attacks, and to the support relation itself. Secondly, it extends AFRA’s attack relation by allowing attacks to the aforementioned support relation. Moreover, since the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • A Logical Account of Formal Argumentation.Yining Wu, Martin Caminada & Dov M. Gabbay - 2009 - Studia Logica 93 (2-3):383-403.
    In this paper, we prove the correspondence between complete extensions in abstract argumentation and 3-valued stable models in logic programming. This result is in line with earlier work of [6] that identified the correspondence between the grounded extension in abstract argumentation and the well-founded model in logic programming, as well as between the stable extensions in abstract argumentation and the stable models in logic programming.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   51 citations  
  • Ranking comment sorting policies in online debates.Anthony P. Young, Sagar Joglekar, Gioia Boschi & Nishanth Sastry - 2021 - Argument and Computation 12 (2):265-285.
    Online debates typically possess a large number of argumentative comments. Most readers who would like to see which comments are winning arguments often only read a part of the debate. Many platforms that host such debates allow for the comments to be sorted, say from the earliest to latest. How can argumentation theory be used to evaluate the effectiveness of such policies of sorting comments, in terms of the actually winning arguments displayed to a reader who may not have read (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Characterizing acceptability semantics of argumentation frameworks with recursive attack and support relations.Sebastian Gottifredi, Andrea Cohen, Alejandro J. García & Guillermo R. Simari - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence 262 (C):336-368.
    Over the last decade, several extensions of Dung’s Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (AFs) have been introduced in the literature. Some of these extensions concern the nature of the attack relation, such as the consideration of recursive attacks, whereas others incorporate additional interactions, such as a support relation. Recently, the Attack–Support Argumentation Framework (ASAF) was proposed, which accounts for recursive attacks and supports, attacks to supports and supports to attacks, at any level, where the support relation is interpreted as necessity. Currently, to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Applying argumentation to structure and visualize multi-dimensional opinion spaces.Gregor Betz, Michael Hamann, Tamara Mchedlidze & Sophie von Schmettow - 2018 - Argument and Computation 10 (1):23-40.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Argument schemes and visualization software for critical thinking about international politics.Nancy L. Green, Michael Branon & Luke Roosje - 2018 - Argument and Computation 10 (1):41-53.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • A formalisation and prototype implementation of argumentation for statistical model selection.Isabel Sassoon, Sebastian Zillessen, Jeroen Keppens & Peter McBurney - 2018 - Argument and Computation 10 (1):83-103.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Investigating subclasses of abstract dialectical frameworks.Martin Diller, Atefeh Keshavarzi Zafarghandi, Thomas Linsbichler & Stefan Woltran - 2020 - Argument and Computation 11 (1-2):191-219.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Audiences in argumentation frameworks.Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Sylvie Doutre & Paul E. Dunne - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence 171 (1):42-71.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   46 citations