Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (4 other versions)Naming and necessity.Saul Kripke - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Arguing about language. New York: Routledge. pp. 431-433.
    _Naming and Necessity_ has had a great and increasing influence. It redirected philosophical attention to neglected questions of natural and metaphysical necessity and to the connections between these and theories of naming, and of identity. This seminal work, to which today's thriving essentialist metaphysics largely owes its impetus, is here reissued in a newly corrected form with a new preface by the author. If there is such a thing as essential reading in metaphysics, or in philosophy of language, this is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1453 citations  
  • From a Logical Point of View.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1953 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    Several of these essays have been printed whole in journals; others are in varying degrees new. Two main themes run through them. One is the problem of meaning, particularly as involved in the notion of an analytic statement. The other is the notion of ontological, commitment, particularly as involved in the problem of universals.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   863 citations  
  • Thought and reference.Kent Bach - 1987 - New York: Clarendon Press.
    Presenting a novel account of singular thought, a systematic application of recent work in the theory of speech acts, and a partial revival of Russell's analysis of singular terms, this book takes an original approach to the perennial problems of reference and singular terms by separating the underlying issues into different levels of analysis.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   279 citations  
  • Sense and reference.Gottlob Frege - 1948 - Philosophical Review 57 (3):209-230.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   203 citations  
  • Descriptivism defended.Michael Nelson - 2002 - Noûs 36 (3):408–435.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  • (1 other version)Proper names.John R. Searle - 1958 - Mind 67 (266):166-173.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   229 citations  
  • Naming and Necessity: Lectures Given to the Princeton University Philosophy Colloquium.Saul A. Kripke - 1980 - Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Edited by Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel.
    A transcript of three lectures, given at Princeton University in 1970, which deals with (inter alia) debates concerning proper names in the philosophy of language.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1526 citations  
  • Names without bearers.Jerrold J. Katz - 1994 - Philosophical Review 103 (1):1-39.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   34 citations  
  • Recent Defenses of Descriptivism.Anthony Everett - 2005 - Mind and Language 20 (1):103-139.
    David Sosa, Michael Nelson, and Jason Stanley have recently offered a series of interesting and provocative challenges to Kripke's modal arguments against Descriptivism. In this paper I explore these challenges and some of the issues to which they give rise. I argue that, in the end, all three challenges fail.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Good news about the description theory of names.Bart Geurts - 1997 - Journal of Semantics 14 (4):319-348.
    This is an attempt at reviving Kneale's version of the description theory of names, which says that a proper name is synonymous with a definite description of the form ‘the individual named so-and-so’. To begin with, I adduce a wide range of observations to show that names and overt definites are alike in all relevant respects. I then turn to Kripke's main objection against Kneale's proposal, and endeavour to refute it. In the remainder of the paper I elaborate on Kneale's (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   108 citations  
  • Are proper names rigid designators?Pierre Baumann - 2010 - Axiomathes 20 (2-3):333-346.
    A widely accepted thesis in the philosophy of language is that natural language proper names are rigid designators, and that they are so de jure, or as a matter of the “semantic rules of the language.” This paper questions this claim, arguing that rigidity cannot be plausibly construed as a property of name types and that the alternative, rigidity construed as a property of tokens, means that they cannot be considered rigid de jure; rigidity in this case must be viewed (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • VIII*—Improper Singular Terms.J. J. Valberg - 1971 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 71 (1):121-146.
    J. J. Valberg; VIII*—Improper Singular Terms, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 71, Issue 1, 1 June 1971, Pages 121–146, https://doi.org/10.1093/a.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Improper Singular Terms.J. J. Valberg - 1971 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 71:121 - 145.
    J. J. Valberg; VIII*—Improper Singular Terms, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Volume 71, Issue 1, 1 June 1971, Pages 121–146, https://doi.org/10.1093/a.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations