- Zeno’s Paradoxes.Wesley Charles Salmon (ed.) - 1970 - Indianapolis, IN, USA: Bobbs-Merrill.details
|
|
(1 other version)Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes of Motion.Adolf Grünbaum - 1970 - In Wesley Charles Salmon (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes. Indianapolis, IN, USA: Bobbs-Merrill. pp. 200--250.details
|
|
The form of the Benardete dichotomy.Nicholas Shackel - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2):397-417.details
|
|
A physical model of Zeno's dichotomy.Leonard Angel - 2001 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (2):347-358.details
|
|
Tasks and Supertasks.James Thomson - 1954 - Analysis 15 (1):1--13.details
|
|
Infinity.José A. Benardete - 1964 - Oxford,: Clarendon Press.details
|
|
Newtonian supertasks: A critical analysis.Joseph S. Alper & Mark Bridger - 1998 - Synthese 114 (2):355-369.details
|
|
Tasks, super-tasks, and the modern eleatics.Paul Benacerraf - 1962 - Journal of Philosophy 59 (24):765-784.details
|
|
A reply to new Zeno.Stephen Yablo - 2000 - Analysis 60 (2):148-151.details
|
|
Comments on Professor Benacerraf's Paper.James Thomson - 1970 - In Wesley Charles Salmon (ed.), Zeno’s Paradoxes. Indianapolis, IN, USA: Bobbs-Merrill. pp. 130--138.details
|
|
How Many Physically Distinguished Parts Can a Limited Body Contain?Milos Arsenijevic - 1989 - Analysis 49 (1):36 - 42.details
|
|
(1 other version)Infinity, an essay in metaphysics. [REVIEW]R. Blanché - 1964 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 156:502-503.details
|
|