Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (2 other versions)Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology.Rudolf Carnap - 2011 - In Robert B. Talisse & Scott F. Aikin (eds.), The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce Through the Present. Princeton University Press. pp. 249-264.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   294 citations  
  • 'By Leibniz's law': Remarks on a fallacy.By Benjamin Schnieder - 2006 - Philosophical Quarterly 56 (222):39–54.
    The article is an investigation of a certain form of argument that refers to Leibniz’s Law as its inference ticket (where Leibniz’s Law is understood as the thesis that if x=y.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • A Problem in Possible Worlds Semantics.David Kaplan - 1995 - In Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, Diana Raffman & Nicholas Asher (eds.), Modality, morality, and belief: essays in honor of Ruth Barcan Marcus. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 41-52.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   73 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Introduction to Semantics.Rudolf Carnap - 1945 - Mind 54 (214):171-176.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   71 citations  
  • Why Logically Equivalent Predicates May Pick out Different Properties.Elliott Sober - 1982 - American Philosophical Quarterly 19 (2):183-189.
    The properties, theoretical magnitudes, and natural kinds which science seeks to characterize, and not the sense or meanings which parts of speech may possess, are the subject of this paper. Many philosophers (e.g., Putnam [1971] and Achinstein [1974]) have agreed that two predicates of different meaning may pick out the same property, but they usually hold that that logically equivalent predicates must pick out the same properties. I propose to deny this thesis. My argument is by way of an example (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   43 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Philosophy of Logical Atomism.Bertrand Russell - 1940 - Open Court. Edited by David Pears.
    THE PHILOSOPHY which I advocate is generally regarded as a species of realism, and accused of inconsistency because of the elements in it which seem contrary to that doctrine. For my part, I do not regard the issue between realists and their opponents as a funda- mental one; I could alter my view on this issue without changing my mind as to any of the doctrines upon which I wish to lay stress. I hold that logic is what is fundamental (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   330 citations  
  • (1 other version)A World of States of Affairs.[author unknown] - 1999 - Noûs 33 (3):473-495.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   138 citations  
  • (1 other version)Meaning and Modality.Casimir Lewy - 1980 - Noûs 14 (1):125-129.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • (1 other version)Laws of Nature.John Carroll - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (4):603-609.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   150 citations  
  • (1 other version)Meaning and Modality.Casimir Lewy - 1977 - Philosophy 52 (202):486-488.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • From an Ontological Point of View.John Heil - 2003 - Philosophy 79 (309):491-494.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   402 citations