Switch to: Citations

References in:

Reasoning from Conflicting Sources

In Hans V. Hansen, Christopher W. Tindale, J. Anthony Blair, Ralph H. Johnson & David M. Godden (eds.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground. Proceedings 2007 [CD-ROM]. Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. pp. 1-9 (2007)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. A Logic for Default Reasoning.Ray Reiter - 1980 - Artificial Intelligence 13:81-137.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   227 citations  
  • Letters to Beall and Priest.David Lewis - 2004 - In Graham Priest, Jc Beall & Bradley P. Armour-Garb (eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction : New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press. pp. 176--177.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Knowledge and Non-Contradiction.Bryson Brown - 2004 - In Graham Priest, J. C. Beall & Bradley Armour-Garb (eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction. Clarendon Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Paraconsistent Logic.Graham Priest - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   67 citations  
  • In Contradiction, A Study of the Transconsistent.Graham Priest - 1991 - Noûs 25 (3):380-383.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   90 citations  
  • Monotonicity in Practical Reasoning.Kenneth G. Ferguson - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (3):335-346.
    Classic deductive logic entails that once a conclusion is sustained by a valid argument, the argument can never be invalidated, no matter how many new premises are added. This derived property of deductive reasoning is known as monotonicity. Monotonicity is thought to conflict with the defeasibility of reasoning in natural language, where the discovery of new information often leads us to reject conclusions that we once accepted. This perceived failure of monotonic reasoning to observe the defeasibility of natural-language arguments has (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Non-Monotonicity and Informal Reasoning: Comment on Ferguson (2003).Mike Oaksford & Ulrike Hahn - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (2):245-251.
    In this paper, it is argued that Ferguson’s (2003, Argumentation 17, 335–346) recent proposal to reconcile monotonic logic with defeasibility has three counterintuitive consequences. First, the conclusions that can be derived from his new rule of inference are vacuous, a point that as already made against default logics when there are conflicting defaults. Second, his proposal requires a procedural “hack” to the break the symmetry between the disjuncts of the tautological conclusions to which his proposal leads. Third, Ferguson’s proposal amounts (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • In Contradiction: A Study of the Transconsistent.G. Priest - 1989 - Philosophical Quarterly 39 (157):498-502.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   61 citations  
  • Paradox and Paraconsistency: Conflict Resolution in the Abstract Sciences.John Woods - 2007 - Studia Logica 85 (3):425-428.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Philosophy of Logic.W. V. Quine - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (6):174-178.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • Paradox and Paraconsistency: Conflict Resolution in the Abstract Sciences.John Woods - 2004 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 10 (1):116-118.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Uncertain Inference. Kyburg Jr & Choh Man Teng - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.
    Coping with uncertainty is a necessary part of ordinary life and is crucial to an understanding of how the mind works. For example, it is a vital element in developing artificial intelligence that will not be undermined by its own rigidities. There have been many approaches to the problem of uncertain inference, ranging from probability to inductive logic to nonmonotonic logic. Thisbook seeks to provide a clear exposition of these approaches within a unified framework. The principal market for the book (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  • Yes, Virginia, There Really Are Paraconsistent Logics.Bryson Brown - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (5):489-500.
    B. H. Slater has argued that there cannot be any truly paraconsistent logics, because it's always more plausible to suppose whatever "negation" symbol is used in the language is not a real negation, than to accept the paraconsistent reading. In this paper I neither endorse nor dispute Slater's argument concerning negation; instead, my aim is to show that as an argument against paraconsistency, it misses (some of) the target. A important class of paraconsistent logics - the preservationist logics - are (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Commentary on Plumer & Olson.John Woods - unknown
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Philosophy of Logic.Leslie Stevenson & W. V. Quine - 1972 - Philosophical Quarterly 22 (86):80.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   98 citations  
  • Frontiers of Paraconsistent Logic.Diderik Batens - 2000
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations