Switch to: Citations

References in:

Reporting on responsible drinking: a study of the major UK pub-owning companies

John D. Pratten

Business Ethics: A European Review 16 (1):62-70 (2007)

Add references

You must login to add references.

The association between corporate social-responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost. [REVIEW]Moses L. Pava & Joshua Krausz - 1996 - Journal of Business Ethics 15 (3):321 - 357.details It is generally assumed that common stock investors are exclusively interested in earning the highest level of future cash-flow for a given amount of risk. This view suggests that investors select a well-diversified portfolio of securities to achieve this goal. Accordingly, it is often assumed that investors are unwilling to pay a premium for corporate behavior which can be described as socially-responsible.Recently, this view has been under increasing attack. According to the Social Investment Forum, at least 538 institutional investors now (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 89 citations
(1 other version)Answering allegations: the use of the corporate website for restorative ethical and social disclosure.David Campbell & A. Cornelia Beck - 2004 - Business Ethics 13 (2-3):100-116.details Download Export citation Bookmark 9 citations
Ethics from the top: Top management and ethical business.Doris Schroeder - 2002 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 11 (3):260–267.details Codes of ethics and conduct typically demand the highest standard of ethical behaviour from every single employee. This implies a democratic or lobbyist understanding of ethics in business. The contrasting view would argue that business ethics is an elitist undertaking that can only be instigated from the top, by managing directors or owner managers. This article looks at three types of ethical businesses, three types of approaches to ethical problem‐solving, and three possible incentives for ethical business to see which of (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 26 citations
(2 other versions)Individual, Collective and Social Responsibility of the Firm.Tuomo Takala & Paul Pallab - 2000 - Business Ethics: A European Review 9 (2):109-118.details The main concern of this paper is the moral responsibility of the firm, as well as of the individuals in a firm, to uphold environmental protection. Much of the business ethics literature defines corporate social responsibility in terms of stakeholder relationships, and the emphasis is frequently on collective as opposed to individual responsibility. This paper has three objectives. The first is to clarify the nature of moral responsibility, and the distinction between legal and moral responsibility. The second objective is to (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 17 citations
(2 other versions)Voluntary social disclosures by large UK companies.Stephen Brammer & Stephen Pavelin - 2004 - Business Ethics 13 (2-3):86-99.details Download Export citation Bookmark 23 citations
(2 other versions)Voluntary social disclosures by large UK companies.Stephen Brammer & Stephen Pavelin - 2004 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 13 (2-3):86-99.details Download Export citation Bookmark 23 citations
(2 other versions)Individual, collective and social responsibility of the firm.Tuomo Takala & Paul Pallab - 2000 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 9 (2):109–118.details The main concern of this paper is the moral responsibility of the firm, as well as of the individuals in a firm, to uphold environmental protection. Much of the business ethics literature defines corporate social responsibility in terms of stakeholder relationships, and the emphasis is frequently on collective as opposed to individual responsibility. This paper has three objectives. The first is to clarify the nature of moral responsibility, and the distinction between legal and moral responsibility. The second objective is to (...) Download Export citation Bookmark 19 citations

1