Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (2 other versions)Change blindness: Past, present, and future. [REVIEW]Daniel J. Simons & Ronald A. Rensink - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (1):16-20.
    Change blindness is the striking failure to see large changes that normally would be noticed easily. Over the past decade this phenomenon has greatly contributed to our understanding of attention, perception, and even consciousness. The surprising extent of change blindness explains its broad appeal, but its counterintuitive nature has also engendered confusions about the kinds of inferences that legitimately follow from it. Here we discuss the legitimate and the erroneous inferences that have been drawn, and offer a set of requirements (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   121 citations  
  • Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes.Christof Koch & Naotsugu Tsuchiya - 2007 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (1):16-22.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   187 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Change Blindness.Ronald A. Rensink - 2005 - In Laurent Itti, Geraint Rees & John K. Tsotsos (eds.), Neurobiology of Attention. Academic Press. pp. 76--81.
    Large changes that occur in clear view of an observer can become difficult to notice if made during an eye movement, blink, or other such disturbance. This change blindness is consistent with the proposal that focused visual attention is necessary to see change, with a change becoming difficult to notice whenever conditions prevent attention from being automatically drawn to it. -/- It is shown here how the phenomenon of change blindness can provide new results on the nature of visual attention, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   68 citations  
  • Attention is more than prediction precision.Howard Bowman, Marco Filetti, Brad Wyble & Christian Olivers - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):206-208.
    A cornerstone of the target article is that, in a predictive coding framework, attention can be modelled by weighting prediction error with a measure of precision. We argue that this is not a complete explanation, especially in the light of ERP (event-related potentials) data showing large evoked responses for frequently presented target stimuli, which thus are predicted.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Attention, Intention, and Priority in the Parietal Lobe.James W. Bisley & Michael E. Goldberg - 2010 - Annual Review of Neuroscience 33:1-21.
    For many years there has been a debate about the role of the parietal lobe in the generation of behavior. Does it generate movement plans (intention) or choose objects in the environment for further processing? To answer this, we focus on the lateral intraparietal area (LIP), an area that has been shown to play independent roles in target selection for saccades and the generation of visual attention. Based on results from a variety of tasks, we propose that LIP acts as (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain?Karl Friston - 2009 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 (7):293-301.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   261 citations  
  • Unconscious attention modulates the silencing effect of top-down predictions.Xu Chen, Guangming Ran, Qi Zhang & Tianqiang Hu - 2015 - Consciousness and Cognition 34:63-72.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations