Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. YAMATO: Yet-another more advanced top-level ontology.Riichiro Mizoguchi & Stefano Borgo - 2022 - Applied ontology 17 (1):211-232.
    yamato sharply distinguishes itself from other existing upper ontologies in the following respects. (1) Most importantly, yamato is designed with both engineering and philosophical minds. (2) yamato is based on a sophisticated theory of roles, given that the world is full of roles. (3) yamato has a tenable theory of functions which helps to deal with artifacts effectively. (4) Information is a ‘content-bearing’ entity and it differs significantly from the entities that philosophers have traditionally discussed. Taking into account the modern (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • The water falls but the waterfall does not fall: New perspectives on objects, processes and events.Antony Galton & Riichiro Mizoguchi - 2009 - Applied ontology 4 (2):71-107.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   51 citations  
  • SNAP and SPAN: Towards dynamic spatial ontology.Pierre Grenon & Barry Smith - 2004 - Spatial Cognition and Computation 4 (1):69–103.
    We propose a modular ontology of the dynamic features of reality. This amounts, on the one hand, to a purely spatial ontology supporting snapshot views of the world at successive instants of time and, on the other hand, to a purely spatiotemporal ontology of change and process. We argue that dynamic spatial ontology must combine these two distinct types of inventory of the entities and relationships in reality, and we provide characterizations of spatiotemporal reasoning in the light of the interconnections (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   53 citations  
  • The cornucopia of formal-ontological relations.Barry Smith & Pierre Grenon - 2004 - Dialectica 58 (3):279–296.
    The paper presents a new method for generating typologies of formal-ontological relations. The guiding idea is that formal relations are those sorts of relations which hold between entities which are constituents of distinct ontologies. We provide examples of ontologies (in the spirit of Zemach’s classic “Four Ontologies” of 1970), and show how these can be used to give a rich typology of formal relations in a way which also throws light on the opposition between threeand four-dimensionalism.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  • (1 other version)Causal relations.Donald Davidson - 1967 - Journal of Philosophy 64 (21):691-703.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   340 citations