Switch to: Citations

References in:

Ontology relativized: Reply to Moulines

Synthese 151 (3):325 - 330 (2006)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Is the World Really “Dappled”? A Response to Cartwright’s Charge against “Cross‐Wise Reduction”.Stéphanie Ruphy - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (1):57-67.
    Nancy Cartwright's charge against horizontal reductionism leads to a claim about how the world is, namely "dappled." By proposing a simple thought-experiment, I show that Cartwright's division of the world into "nomological" machines and "messy" systems for which no law applies is meaningless. The thought-experiment shows that for a system, having the property of being a nomological machine depends on what kind of questions you ask about it. No metaphysical conclusion about the world being unruly or not can be drawn (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science.Nancy Cartwright - 1999 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    It is often supposed that the spectacular successes of our modern mathematical sciences support a lofty vision of a world completely ordered by one single elegant theory. In this book Nancy Cartwright argues to the contrary. When we draw our image of the world from the way modern science works - as empiricism teaches us we should - we end up with a world where some features are precisely ordered, others are given to rough regularity and still others behave in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   571 citations  
  • The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation.Ernest Nagel - 1961 - New York, NY, USA: Harcourt, Brace & World.
    Introduction: Science and Common Sense Long before the beginnings of modern civilization, men ac- quired vast funds of information about their environment. ...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   483 citations  
  • The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science.John Dupré - 1993 - Harvard University Press.
    With this manifesto, John Dupré systematically attacks the ideal of scientific unity by showing how its underlying assumptions are at odds with the central conclusions of science itself.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   658 citations  
  • Logical Foundations of the Unity of Science.Rudolf Carnap - 1991 - In Richard Boyd, Philip Gasper & J. D. Trout (eds.), The Philosophy of Science. MIT Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   51 citations  
  • Philosophy and Spacetime Physics.Lawrence Sklar - 1985 - University of California Press.
    Twelve essays explore the philosophy of science in general and the physical sciences in particular A common theme unites all twelve essays: In discussing the ...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation.Ernest Nagel - 1962 - Philosophy 37 (142):372-374.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   222 citations  
  • (1 other version)International Encyclopedia of Unified Science.Otto Neurath, Rudolph Carnap & Charles W. Morris - 1957 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 8 (31):256-257.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation.Ernest Nagel - 1981 - Science and Society 45 (4):475-480.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   200 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation.Ernest Nagel - 1961 - Mind 72 (287):429-441.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   293 citations  
  • Ontology, Reduction, and the Unity of Science.C. Ulises Moulines - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 10:19-27.
    Ontology should be conceived as supervenient on scientific theories. They tell us what categories of things there really are. Thus, we would have a unique system of ontology if we would attain the unity of science through a reductionist program. For this, it should be clear how a relation of intertheoretical reduction (with ontological implications) is to be conceived. A formal proposal is laid out in this paper. This allows us also to define the notion of a fundamental theory. Now, (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations