Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Frege’s Puzzle (2nd edition).Nathan U. Salmon - 1986 - Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company.
    This is the 1991 (2nd) edition of the 1986 book (MIT Press), considered to be the classic defense of Millianism. The nature of the information content of declarative sentences is a central topic in the philosophy of language. The natural view that a sentence like "John loves Mary" contains information in which two individuals occur as constituents is termed the naive theory, and is one that has been abandoned by most contemporary scholars. This theory was refuted originally by philosopher Gottlob (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   535 citations  
  • Enlightened semantics for simple sentences.G. Forbes - 1999 - Analysis 59 (2):86-91.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • (1 other version)Direct reference, propositional attitudes, and semantic content.Scott Soames - 2009 - In Philosophical Essays, Volume 2: The Philosophical Significance of Language. Princeton University Press. pp. 33-71.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   175 citations  
  • (1 other version)Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes, and Semantic Content.Scott Soames - 1987 - Philosophical Topics 15 (1):47-87.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   317 citations  
  • The indispensability of sinn.Graeme Forbes - 1990 - Philosophical Review 99 (4):535-563.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   87 citations  
  • Frege's Puzzle. [REVIEW]Graeme Forbes - 1987 - Philosophical Review 96 (3):455.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   300 citations  
  • Beyond Singular Propositions?Scott Soames - 1995 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (4):515 - 549.
    Propositional attitudes, like believing and asserting, are relations between agents and propositions. Agents are individuals who do the believing and asserting; propositions are things that are believed and asserted. Propositional attitude ascriptions are sentences that ascribe propositional attitudes to agents. For example, a propositional attitude ascription α believes, or asserts, that S is true iff the referent of a bears the relation of believing, or asserting, to the proposition expressed by s. The questions I will address have to do with (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   48 citations  
  • How much substitutivity?Graeme Forbes - 1997 - Analysis 57 (2):109–113.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  • Reply to Marks.Graeme Forbes - 1993 - Philosophical Studies 69 (2-3):281 - 295.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Frege’s puzzle. [REVIEW]A. D. Smith - 1988 - Mind 97 (385):136-137.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   133 citations  
  • Reply to Forbes.Jennifer M. Saul - 1997 - Analysis 57 (2):114–118.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Frege's Puzzle. [REVIEW]Jan Wolenski - 1988 - Studia Logica 47 (4):439-440.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   132 citations