Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Linguistic and cognitive prominence in anaphor resolution: Topic, contrastive focus and pronouns.H. Wind Cowles, Matthew Walenski & Robert Kluender - 2007 - Topoi 26 (1):3-18.
    This paper examines the role that linguistic and cognitive prominence play in the resolution of anaphor–antecedent relationships. In two experiments, we found that pronouns are immediately sensitive to the cognitive prominence of potential antecedents when other antecedent selection cues are uninformative. In experiment 1, results suggest that despite their theoretical dissimilarities, topic and contrastive focus both serve to enhance cognitive prominence. Results from experiment 2 suggest that the contrastive prosody appropriate for focus constructions may also play an important role in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Pragmatic and Linguistics: An Analysis of Sentence Topics.Tanya Reinhart - 1982 - Indiana University Linguistics Club.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   43 citations  
  • Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis.Amit Almor - 1999 - Psychological Review 106 (4):748-765.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse.Peter C. Gordon, Barbara J. Grosz & Laura A. Gilliom - 1993 - Cognitive Science 17 (3):311-347.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  • Pragmatics and Linguistics: an analysis of Sentence Topics.Tanya Reinhart - 1981 - Philosophica 27.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   63 citations  
  • Coherence and coreference revisited.Andrew Kehler, Laura Kertz, Hannah Rohde & Jeffrey L. Elman - 2008 - Journal of Semantics 25 (1):1-44.
    For more than three decades, research into the psycholinguistics of pronoun interpretation has argued that hearers use various interpretation ‘preferences’ or ‘strategies’ that are associated with specific linguistic properties of antecedent expressions. This focus is a departure from the type of approach outlined in Hobbs , who argues that the mechanisms supporting pronoun interpretation are driven predominantly by semantics, world knowledge and inference, with particular attention to how these are used to establish the coherence of a discourse. On the basis (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  • Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse.Jeanette Gundel, Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski - 1993 - Language 69:274--307.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   103 citations  
  • The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language.E. KaisEr & J. Trueswell - 2004 - Cognition 94 (2):113-147.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • Marking the counterfactual: ERP evidence for pragmatic processing of German subjunctives.Eugenia Kulakova, Dominik Freunberger & Dietmar Roehm - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8:91674.
    Counterfactual conditionals are frequently used in language to express potentially valid reasoning from factually false suppositions. Counterfactuals provide two pieces of information: their literal meaning expresses a suppositional dependency between an antecedent (If the dice had been rigged...) and a consequent (… then the game would have been unfair). Their second, backgrounded meaning refers to the opposite state of affairs and suggests that, in fact, the dice were not rigged and the game was fair. Counterfactual antecedents are particularly intriguing because (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation