Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Fraenkel–Carnap Questions for Equivalence Relations.George Weaver & Irena Penev - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Logic 10:52-66.
    An equivalence is a binary relational system A = (A,ϱA) where ϱA is an equivalence relation on A. A simple expansion of an equivalence is a system of the form (Aa1…an) were A is an equivalence and a1,…,an are members of A. It is shown that the Fraenkel-Carnap question when restricted to the class of equivalences or to the class of simple expansions of equivalences has a positive answer: that the complete second-order theory of such a system is categorical, if (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Fraenkel-Carnap properties.G. Au George Weaver - 2005 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 51 (3):285.
    In the 1920's Fraenkel and Carnap raised the question of whether or not every finitely axiomatizable semantically complete theory formulated in the theory of types is categorical. Partial answers to this and a related question are presented for theories formulated in second-order logic.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Carnap, the universality of language and extremality axioms.Jaakko Hintikka - 1991 - Erkenntnis 35 (1-3):325 - 336.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Grundzuge der Theoretischen Logik.W. V. Quine - 1938 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 3 (2):83-84.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Über Extremalaxiome.Rudolf Carnap & Friedrich Bachmann - 1936 - Erkenntnis 6 (1):166-188.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  • Abriss der Logistik. [REVIEW]Harry T. Costello - 1930 - Journal of Philosophy 27 (4):109-110.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Einleitung in die Mengenlehre.A. Fraenkel - 1924 - Annalen der Philosophie Und Philosophischen Kritik 4 (6):61-63.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations