Thomas S. Kuhn's classic book is now available with a new index.

'Pathological' science implies scientific misconduct: it should not happen and the scientists concerned ought to know better. However, there are no clear and generally agreed definitions of pathological science or of scientific misconduct. The canonical exemplars of pathological science in chemistry (N-rays, polywater) as well as the recent case of cold fusion in electrochemistry involved research practices not clearly distinguishable from those in (revolutionary) science. The concept of 'pathological science' was put forth nearly half a century ago in a seminar (...) and lacks justification in contemporary understanding of science studies (history, philosophy, and sociology of science). It is time to abandon the phrase. (shrink)