Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)Forms of Talk.Erving Goffman - 1979 - Human Studies 5 (2):147-157.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   292 citations  
  • Mortal Questions.Laurence Nemirow - 1980 - Philosophical Review 89 (3):473.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   88 citations  
  • Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences.Andrew Delano Abbott - 2004 - W W Norton & Company.
    Abbott helps social science students discover what questions to ask. This exciting book is not about habits and the mechanics of doing social science research, but about habits of thinking that enable students to use those mechanics in new ways, by coming up with new ideas and combining them more effectively with old ones. Abbott organizes his book around general methodological moves, and uses examples from throughout the social sciences to show how these moves can open new lines of thinking. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Remembering.F. C. Bartlett - 1935 - Scientia 29 (57):221.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   390 citations  
  • (1 other version)Forms of Talk.Erving Goffman - 1981 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 17 (3):181-182.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   230 citations  
  • Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience.Erving Goffman - 1974 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 (4):601-602.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   474 citations  
  • Chaos of Disciplines.Andrew Abbott - 2001 - University of Chicago Press.
    This work presents analysis of the evolution and development of the social sciences. It reconsiders how knowledge actually changes and advances. Challenging the accepted belief that social sciences are in a perpetual state of progress, this work contends that there is a core set of principles.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   63 citations  
  • Definite Knowledge and Mutual Knowledge.Herbert H. Clark & Catherine R. Marshall - 1981 - In Aravind K. Joshi, Bonnie L. Webber & Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 10–63.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   82 citations  
  • Relevance: Communication and Cognition.Dan Sperber & Deirdre Wilson - 1986/1995 - Oxford: Blackwell.
    This revised edition includes a new Preface outlining developments in Relevance Theory since 1986, discussing the more serious criticisms of the theory, and ...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1176 citations  
  • How to do things with words.John L. Austin - 1962 - Oxford [Eng.]: Clarendon Press. Edited by Marina Sbisá & J. O. Urmson.
    For this second edition, the editors have returned to Austin's original lecture notes, amending the printed text where it seemed necessary.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1664 citations  
  • (1 other version)Mortal questions.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Death.--The absurd.--Moral luck.--Sexual perversion.--War and massacre.--Ruthlessness in public life.--The policy of preference.--Equality.--The fragmentation of value.--Ethics without biology.--Brain bisection and the unity of consciousness.--What is it like to be a bat?--Panpsychism.--Subjective and objective.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   715 citations  
  • Goffman's framing order: Style as structure.Peter K. Manning - 1980 - In Jason Ditton (ed.), The View from Goffman. New York: St. Martin's Press. pp. 252--84.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The nature of explanation.Kenneth James Williams Craik - 1943 - Cambridge,: Cambridge University Press.
    Craik published only one complete work of any length, this essay on The Nature of Explanation.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   307 citations  
  • Definite reference and mutual knowledge In Aravind K. Joshi, Bonnie L. Webber, and Ivan A. Sag, editors.Herbert H. Clark & Catherine R. Marshall - 1981 - In Aravind K. Joshi, Bonnie L. Webber & Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   70 citations  
  • The View from Goffman.Jason Ditton (ed.) - 1980 - New York: St. Martin's Press.
    Ditton, J. A bibliographic exegesis of Goffman's sociology.--Lofland, J. Early Goffman: syle, structure, substance, soul.--Psathas, G. Early Goffman and the analysis of fact-to-face interaction in Strategic interaction--Hepworth, M. Deviance and control in everyday life.--Rogers, M. F. Goffman on power hierarchy, and status.--Gonos, G. The class position of Goffman's sociology.--Collins, R. Erving Goffman and the development of modern social theory.--Williams, R. Goffman's sociology of talk.--Crook, S. and Taylor, L. Goffman's version of reality.--Manning, P. K. Goffman's framing order: style as structure.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Nature of Explanation. [REVIEW]E. N. & Kenneth J. W. Craik - 1943 - Journal of Philosophy 40 (24):667.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   285 citations  
  • Relevance.D. Sperber & Deirdre Wilson - 1986 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 2.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   803 citations  
  • What is context?Benny Shanon - 1990 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (2):157–166.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Cognition and emotion? The dead end in self-esteem research.Thomas J. Scheff & David S. Fearon - 2004 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (1):73–90.
    This article suggests that studies of self-esteem using scales have reached a dead end, and suggest alternative directions. First we show how significance tests have obscured meager results. According to reviews, this huge body of research has yielded no substantial findings. Some sub-fields show consistent, but trivially small, effects; reviews of the entire field show none at all. Most important, the size of effects does not seem to be increasing. Three questions are raised: 1. Are new standards needed to determine (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations