Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. >>Geometry and Nature<<: Leibniz and Johann Bernoulli's Theory of Motion.P. M. Heimann - 1977 - Centaurus 21 (1):1-26.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Of Gods and Kings: Natural Philosophy and Politics in the Leibniz-Clarke Disputes.Steven Shapin - 1981 - Isis 72 (2):187-215.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Eighteenth-Century Attempts to Resolve the Vis viva Controversy.Thomas Hankins - 1965 - Isis 56 (3):281-297.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • (1 other version)Monadology (1714).Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz - unknown
    Copyright © 2010–2015 All rights reserved. Jonathan Bennett [Brackets] enclose editorial explanations. Small ·dots· enclose material that has been added, but can be read as though it were part of the original text. Occasional •bullets, and also indenting of passages that are not quotations, are meant as aids to grasping the structure of a sentence or a thought. Every four-point ellipsis . . . . indicates the omission of a brief passage that seems to present more difficulty than it is (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   64 citations  
  • “In the Warehouse”: Privacy, Property and Priority in the Early Royal Society.Rob Iliffe - 1992 - History of Science 30 (1):29-68.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Natural Philosophy and Public Spectacle in the Eighteenth Century.Simon Schaffer - 1983 - History of Science 21 (1):1-43.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   60 citations  
  • Concepts of power: natural philosophy and the uses of machines in mid-eighteenth-century London.Alan Q. Morton - 1995 - British Journal for the History of Science 28 (1):63-78.
    How may scientific research contribute effectively to industrial development? This question has been debated for many years. However, a recent development in this discussion has come from a number of eminent scientists and others who have become concerned with what has become known as the public understanding of science. According to them, a greater understanding of science by members of the public would result in a higher value being placed on scientific research, which, eventually, would result in both increased social (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • (1 other version)Thinking Matter: Materialism in Eighteenth-Century Britain.John W. Yolton - 1984 - Philosophy 59 (230):554-555.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  • Theory and practice in air-pump construction: The cooperation between Willem Jacob's Gravesande and Jan van Musschenbroek.Anne C. van Helden - 1994 - Annals of Science 51 (5):477-495.
    In 1714, the Dutch scholar Willem Jacob's Gravesande published a theoretical essay on how to optimize the air-pump. Although his paper did not attract much attention, there was one important supplier of air-pumps who knew about it: the Leiden instrument maker Jan van Musschenbroek. 's Gravesande and he cooperated intensively between 1717 and 1742. Among other things, this cooperation resulted in two new air-pump designs to replace Musschenbroek's own models. A closer analysis of's Gravesande's influence on Musschenbroek's repertoire reveals that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Decline of Cartesianism in Mechanics: The Leibnizian-Cartesian Debates.Carolyn Iltis - 1973 - Isis 64 (3):356-373.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • The Leibnizian-Newtonian Debates: Natural Philosophy and Social Psychology.Carolyn Iltis - 1973 - British Journal for the History of Science 6 (4):343-377.
    By the time of the Leibniz-Clarke correspondence of 1716 the Newtonian and Leibnizian systems of natural philosophy had reached maturity. Each system consisted of different physical as well as metaphysical principles which, taken together, formed a world view. At the time of their famous debates, Leibniz at 70 and Newton at 74, the founders of two highly developed scientific philosophies, were struggling to establish and defend the ontological and mechanical bases of differing bodies of organized knowledge.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations