Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (1 other version)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again.Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):187-195.
    A growing interest in and concern about the adequacy and fairness of modern peer-review practices in publication and funding are apparent across a wide range of scientific disciplines. Although questions about reliability, accountability, reviewer bias, and competence have been raised, there has been very little direct research on these variables.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   193 citations  
  • Peer Review and Public Policy. [REVIEW]Sheila Jasanoff & Daryl Chubin - 1985 - Science, Technology and Human Values 10 (3):3-5.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1991 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14 (1):119-135.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  • Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system. [REVIEW]Harriet Zuckerman & Robert K. Merton - 1971 - Minerva 9 (1):66-100.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   90 citations