Discusses contemporary notions of the self, and examines their origins, development, and effects.

De zorgverlening is een sector van de samenleving die vandaag de dag in toenemende mate van karakter lijkt te veranderen. Zo is regionalisering een bestuursfilosofie van de overheid die ertoe leidt dat zorg wordt verleend door seculiere, regionale organisaties in plaats van landelijke organisaties met een levensbeschouwelijke signatuur. Of denk aan de verzakelijking in de thuiszorg, die ertoe leidt dat zorg wordt verleend als losse, inkoopbare pakketjes door diverse zorgaanbieders in plaats van integrale hulp die uitdrukking geeft aan de sociale (...) verantwoordelijkheid van een maatschappelijk georganiseerde groep mensen. Was een levensbeschouwelijk geïnspireerde moraal voor veel van de zorgverlening vanouds een belangrijk organisatieprincipe, nu lijkt er in de liberale samenleving te moeten worden uitgegaan van algemene, levensbeschouwelijk en moreel neutrale principes. (shrink)

'Most of us are still groping for answers about what makes life worth living, or what confers meaning on individual lives', writes Charles Taylor in Sources of the Self. 'This is an essentially modern predicament.' Charles Taylor's latest book sets out to define the modern identity by tracing its genesis, analysing the writings of such thinkers as Augustine, Descartes, Montaigne, Luther, and many others. This then serves as a starting point for a renewed understanding of modernity. Taylor argues that modern (...) subjectivity has its roots in ideas of human good, and is in fact the result of our long efforts to define and attain the good. The modern turn inwards is far from being a disastrous rejection of rationality, as its critics contend, but has at its heart what Taylor calls the affirmation of ordinary life. He concludes that the modern identity, and its attendant rejection of an objective order of reason, is far richer in moral sources that its detractors allow. Sources of the Self provides a decisive defence of the modern order and a sharp rebuff to its critics. (shrink)

In this volume, some of today's most distinguished philosophers survey the whole field of ethics, from its origins, through the great ethical traditions, to theories of how we ought to live, arguments about specific ethical issues, and the nature of ethics itself. The book can be read straight through from beginning to end; yet the inclusion of a multi-layered index, coupled with a descriptive outline of contents and bibliographies of relevant literature, means that the volume also serves as a work (...) of reference, both for those coming afresh to the study of ethics and for readers already familiar with the subject. (shrink)

By way of introduction I want first to distinguish between several types of pluralism; then I want to consider more closely the pluralism of norms and values in order to formulate, finally, the problem that is central to this essay, the problem of particular versus universal norms.

During the past 25 years, the words “theory of action” and “agency theory” have become key-terms in a new branch of philosophy. The themes appear to gain a centrality and influence such that one is led to think that they should cover most of philosophy, including the foundation for all of the human sciences. The number of treatises on human action and on philosophical and special-scientific theories of action is staggering. For the most part inspired by analytic philosophy, the new (...) approach threatens to take over that school’s central place on the stage of international philosophical concern. Having ousted theory of science from that position with an avalanche of analytic studies, analytic philosophy, in turn, is now being overrun by philosophy of action as supposedly suitable basis for the sciences. (shrink)