Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Science and Hypothesis: Historical Essays on Scientific Methodology.Larry Laudan & R. Laudan - 1981 - Springer.
    This book consists of a collection of essays written between 1965 and 1981. Some have been published elsewhere; others appear here for the first time. Although dealing with different figures and different periods, they have a common theme: all are concerned with examining how the method of hy pothesis came to be the ruling orthodoxy in the philosophy of science and the quasi-official methodology of the scientific community. It might have been otherwise. Barely three centuries ago, hypothetico deduction was in (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   84 citations  
  • Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent.Wayne C. Booth - 1974 - University of Chicago Press.
    When should I change my mind? What can I believe and what must I doubt? In this new "philosophy of good reasons" Wayne C. Booth exposes five dogmas of modernism that have too often inhibited efforts to answer these questions.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • The origins of pragmatism: studies in the philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce and William James.A. J. Ayer - 1968 - San Francisco,: Freeman, Cooper.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • How to do things with words.John L. Austin - 1962 - Oxford [Eng.]: Clarendon Press. Edited by Marina Sbisá & J. O. Urmson.
    For this second edition, the editors have returned to Austin's original lecture notes, amending the printed text where it seemed necessary.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1665 citations  
  • Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent.Wayne C. Booth - 1975 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 8 (4):250-255.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • Essays in Positive Economics.Milton Friedman - 1953 - University of Chicago Press.
    There is not, of course, a one-to-one relation between policy conclusions and the conclusions of positive economics; if there were, there would be no ...
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   296 citations  
  • The Emperor's Newest Clothes.Martin Hollis - 1985 - Economics and Philosophy 1 (1):128-133.
    There is a simple joy in finding that the emperor has positively no clothes and especially when the finger is pointed in ribald good English. Donald McCloskey does this service in “The Rhetoric of Economics”, where he argues with force and wit that “modernism” (meaning, roughly, positivism, as in “Positive Economics”) will do as an account neither of what economists do nor of what it makes philosophical sense for them to attempt. Instead they should recognize that models are always metaphors (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • (1 other version)Science and Hypothesis.Thomas Nickles - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (4):653-655.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • The Rhetoric of Economics.Deirdre N. Mccloskey - 1986 - Brighton, Sussex : Wheatsheaf Books.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   208 citations  
  • Philosophy of social science.Richard S. Rudner - 1966 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   36 citations  
  • (1 other version)Science and Hypothesis.Thomas Nickles - 1984 - Erkenntnis 21 (3):433-438.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   43 citations  
  • Book Review:Essays in Positive Economics. Milton Friedman. [REVIEW]Henry M. Oliver Jr - 1954 - Ethics 65 (1):71-.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   199 citations  
  • (1 other version)The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas.Thomas Mccarthy - 1978 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 49 (3):525-526.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   67 citations  
  • Weintraub's Aims: A Brief Rejoinder.Alexander Rosenberg - 1987 - Economics and Philosophy 3 (1):143-144.
    Weintraub is not really interested in whether economics is “science” or not. “Economists are not so unsophisticated as to think that calling economics a ‘science’ says anything about what economists do or should do”. But can it really be a matter of indifference to him whether the subject has the character of chemistry as opposed to literary criticism?
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • From a Logical Point of View.Willard Orman Quine - 1953 - Harvard University Press.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   382 citations