Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Mathematical practitioners and instruments in Elizabethan England.Stephen Johnston - 1991 - Annals of Science 48 (4):319-344.
    Summary A new culture of mathematics was developed in sixteenth-century England, the culture of ?the mathematicalls?. Its representatives were the self-styled mathematical practitioners who presented their art as a practical and worldly activity. The careers of two practitioners, Thomas Bedwell and Thomas Hood, are used as case studies to examine the establishment of this culture of the mathematicalls. Both practitioners self-consciously used mathematical instruments as key resources in negotiating their own roles. Bedwell defined his role in contrast to mechanicians and (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Instrument makers in the London guilds.M. A. Crawforth - 1987 - Annals of Science 44 (4):319-377.
    SummaryIn the formative period of London's scientific instrument industry membership of a guild was a necessary step towards owning a business in the City. Through the guilds' formal system of apprenticeship, boys received first-class training in a skilled trade, and learned essential marketing and managerial techniques. By analysing the guilds' records of apprenticeship and subsequent guild life it is possible to determine chains of masters and apprentices by which the knowledge passed from generation to generation. At the same time, dates (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • George Graham, visible technician.Richard Sorrenson - 1999 - British Journal for the History of Science 32 (2):203-221.
    In December of 1675, in a desperate race with Christiaan Huygens over a patent for a spring-regulated watch, Robert Hooke, FRS characterized the clock maker Thomas Tompion as a ‘Slug’, a ‘Clownish Churlish Dog’ and a ‘Rascall’, because Tompion was making a watch of Hooke's design too slowly for the latter's taste. It was Hooke's watch, not Tompion's; Hooke was the patron and Tompion the client. Fifty years later Tompion's apprentice, George Graham, made watches and clocks and quadrants for other (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Spectacles improved to perfection and approved of by the Royal Society.D. J. Bryden & D. L. Simms - 1993 - Annals of Science 50 (1):1-32.
    The letter sent by the Royal Society to the London optician, John Marshall, in 1694, commending his new method of grinding, has been reprinted, and referred to, in recent years. However, there has been no comprehensive analysis of the method itself, the letter and the circumstances in which it was written, nor the consequences for trade practices. The significance of the approval by the Royal Society of this innovation and the use of that approbation by John Marshall and other practitioners (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations