Switch to: Citations

References in:

Dynamic Discourse Referents for Tense and Modals

In Harry Bunt & Reinhard Muskens (eds.), Computing Meaning. Kluwer. pp. 302-321 (1999)

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. (2 other versions)Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Foundations of Language 13 (1):145-151.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1283 citations  
  • (1 other version)Elements of symbolic logic.Hans Reichenbach - 1966 - London: Dover Publications.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   363 citations  
  • Tense and the logic of change.Reinhard Muskens - 1991 - In Talking about Trees and Truth-Conditions. Springer Verlag. pp. 147-183.
    In this paper it is shown how the DRT (Discourse Representation Theory) treatment of temporal anaphora can be formalized within a version of Montague Semantics that is based on classical type logic.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English.Barbara Hall Partee - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (18):601-609.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   186 citations  
  • Combining Montague semantics and discourse representation.Reinhard Muskens - 1996 - Linguistics and Philosophy 19 (2):143 - 186.
    This paper embeds the core part of Discourse Representation Theory in the classical theory of types plus a few simple axioms that allow the theory to express key facts about variables and assignments on the object level of the logic. It is shown how the embedding can be used to combine core analyses of natural language phenomena in Discourse Representation Theory with analyses that can be obtained in Montague Semantics.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   92 citations  
  • Temporal anaphora in discourses of English.Erhard Hinrichs - 1986 - Linguistics and Philosophy 9 (1):63 - 82.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   49 citations  
  • An investigation of the lumps of thought.Angelika Kratzer - 1989 - Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (5):607 - 653.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   181 citations  
  • Nominal and temporal anaphora.Barbara H. Partee - 1984 - Linguistics and Philosophy 7 (3):243--286.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   117 citations  
  • Anaphoric presuppositions and zero anaphora.Kjell Johan Saeboe - 1996 - Linguistics and Philosophy 19 (2):187 - 209.
    The purpose of this paper is to use an anaphoric notion of presupposition for solving the problem of zero argument anaphora. Since Shopen (1973) it has been known that many missing arguments have an anaphoric interpretation, but it has not been known how this interpretation arises. I argue that these arguments are involved in presuppositions. On an anaphoric account of presuppositions as in van der Sandt (1992) or Kamp and Roßdeutscher (1992), it can be shown that the zero arguments acquire (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Elements of Symbolic Logic. [REVIEW]W. V. Quine - 1948 - Journal of Philosophy 45 (6):161-166.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   190 citations  
  • Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse.Craige Roberts - 1989 - Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (6):683 - 721.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   141 citations  
  • Dynamic interpretation of verb phrase ellipsis.Daniel Hardt - 1999 - Linguistics and Philosophy 22 (2):187-221.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • Towards a referential analysis of temporal expressions.Mürvet Enç - 1986 - Linguistics and Philosophy 9 (4):405 - 426.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  • Ellipsis and higher-order unification.Mary Dalrymple, Stuart M. Shieber & Fernando C. N. Pereira - 1991 - Linguistics and Philosophy 14 (4):399 - 452.
    We present a new method for characterizing the interpretive possibilities generated by elliptical constructions in natural language. Unlike previous analyses, which postulate ambiguity of interpretation or derivation in the full clause source of the ellipsis, our analysis requires no such hidden ambiguity. Further, the analysis follows relatively directly from an abstract statement of the ellipsis interpretation problem. It predicts correctly a wide range of interactions between ellipsis and other semantic phenomena such as quantifier scope and bound anaphora. Finally, although the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   53 citations